Literature DB >> 7560050

An evaluation of the Adams forward bend test and the scoliometer in a scoliosis school screening setting.

T W Grossman1, J M Mazur, R J Cummings.   

Abstract

We examined the ability of the Adams forward bend test and the scoliometer to detect truncal rotation or asymmetry in a school screening setting. Of 954 sixth graders examined with each test independently, 123 and 13 [using an angle of trunk rotation (ATR) of > 5 and 7 degrees, respectively] were found to be abnormal on scoliometer examination but appeared normal on the Adams test. Selecting children for scoliometer examination on the basis of the Adams test is not supported by our data and may not be consistent with generally accepted principles of public health screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7560050     DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199507000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  11 in total

1.  Idiopathic scoliosis in Korean schoolchildren: a prospective screening study of over 1 million children.

Authors:  Seung-Woo Suh; Hitesh N Modi; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Jae-Young Hong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluation of spinal posture using Microsoft Kinect™: A preliminary case-study with 98 volunteers.

Authors:  A P G Castro; J D Pacheco; C Lourenço; S Queirós; A H J Moreira; N F Rodrigues; J L Vilaça
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2016-12-27

3.  Rasterstereographic analysis of axial back surface rotation in standing versus forward bending posture in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lars Hackenberg; Eberhard Hierholzer; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Christian Götze
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A review of the trunk surface metrics used as Scoliosis and other deformities evaluation indices.

Authors:  Petros Patias; Theodoros B Grivas; Angelos Kaspiris; Costas Aggouris; Evangelos Drakoutos
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-06-29

5.  Scoliosis: Review of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Joseph A Janicki; Benjamin Alman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Cost-effectiveness of a school-based emotional health screening program.

Authors:  Elena Kuo; Ann Vander Stoep; Elizabeth McCauley; Mary A Kernic
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.118

7.  SOSORT consensus paper: school screening for scoliosis. Where are we today?

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Marian H Wade; Stefano Negrini; Joseph P O'Brien; Toru Maruyama; Martha C Hawes; Manuel Rigo; Hans Rudolf Weiss; Tomasz Kotwicki; Elias S Vasiliadis; Lior Neuhaus Sulam; Tamar Neuhous
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2007-11-26

8.  Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle.

Authors:  Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Ching-Lung Tai; Lih-Huei Chen; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from body scanner image by finite element simulations.

Authors:  Alexander T D Grünwald; Susmita Roy; Ana Alves-Pinto; Renée Lampe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools.

Authors:  Jun Qiao; Leilei Xu; Zezhang Zhu; Feng Zhu; Zhen Liu; Bangping Qian; Yong Qiu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.