Literature DB >> 7559704

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Incidence and clinical assessment of physeal instability.

P E Kallio1, E T Mah, B K Foster, D C Paterson, G W LeQuesne.   

Abstract

In an unselected series of 55 cases of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) we observed an incidence of 25% of epiphyseal reduction, mostly unintentional. Reduction indicated physeal instability and was associated with an effusion, detected by sonography on admission, and inability to bear weight. The true prevalence of instability may be higher since an effusion was noted in 33 cases (60%) on the initial sonographic assessment. Serial radiographs showed reduction in 12 (22%), with an average change of 15.1 degrees in the head-neck angle. Serial sonography showed reduction in 7 out of 20 cases (35%), with an average change of 3.7 mm in displacement. In two cases reduction was seen on sonography but not on radiography. Of the hips which showed subsequent reduction, 12 had had a bone scan on admission; three showed initial epiphyseal avascularity but only one progressed to symptomatic avascular necrosis. All stable hips had normal epiphyseal vascularity on the initial bone scan. This indicates the importance of injury from the initial displacement in causing avascular necrosis, rather than effusion, vascular compromise or iatrogenic injury from gentle repositioning. Physeal instability in SCFE is common and should be assessed clinically on admission. It is indicated by joint effusion or inability to bear weight. A slip is very unlikely to be unstable in a child able to bear weight and with no sonographic effusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7559704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  12 in total

1.  Clinical stability of slipped capital femoral epiphysis does not correlate with intraoperative stability.

Authors:  Kai Ziebarth; Stephan Domayer; Theddy Slongo; Young-Jo Kim; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Is the femoral head dead or alive before surgery of slipped capital femoral epiphysis? Interest of perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Chambenois Edouard; Vialle Raphaël; Ducou Le Pointe Hubert
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 3.  Unstable SCFE: review of treatment modalities and prevalence of osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Ira Zaltz; Geneva Baca; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Increased acetabular depth may influence physeal stability in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  David A Podeszwa; David Gurd; Anthony Riccio; Adriana De La Rocha; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: relevant pathophysiological findings with open surgery.

Authors:  Kai Ziebarth; Michael Leunig; Theddy Slongo; Young-Jo Kim; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an analysis of treatment outcome according to physeal stability.

Authors:  Salah Fallath; Merv Letts
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Case report: bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphyses and hormone replacement.

Authors:  Ali Nourbakhsh; Hasan A Ahmed; Thomas B McAuliffe; Kim J Garges
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Hip decompression of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Talal Ibrahim; Shady Mahmoud; Muhammad Riaz; Abdelsalam Hegazy; David G Little
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 9.  The epidemiology and demographics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Randall T Loder; Elaine N Skopelja
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2011-09-21

10.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Bengt Herngren; Margaretha Stenmarker; Ludek Vavruch; Gunnar Hagglund
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.