BACKGROUND: The most important objective of clinical classifications of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is to identify hips associated with a high risk of avascular necrosis (AVN)--so-called unstable or acute slips; however, closed surgery makes confirmation of physeal stability difficult. Performing the capital realignment procedure in SCFE treatment we observed that clinical estimation of physeal stability did not always correlate with intraoperative findings at open surgery. This motivated us to perform a systematic comparison of the clinical classification systems with the intraoperative observations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Is the classification of an acute versus chronic slip based on the duration of symptoms sensitive and specific in detecting intraoperative disrupted physes in patients with SCFE? (2) Is the stable/unstable classification system based on clinical symptoms sensitive and specific in detecting intraoperative disrupted physes in patients with SCFE? METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with SCFE treated by open surgery between 1996 and 2009. We classified the clinical stability of all hips using the classifications based on onset of symptoms and on function. We classified intraoperative stability as intact or disrupted. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of two classification systems to determine intraoperative stability. RESULTS: Complete physeal disruption at open surgery was seen in 28 of the 82 hips (34%). With classification as acute, acute-on-chronic, and chronic, the sensitivity for disrupted physes was 82% and the specificity was 44%. With the classification of Loder et al., the values were 39% and 76%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Current clinical classification systems are limited in accurately diagnosing the physeal stability in SCFE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: The most important objective of clinical classifications of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is to identify hips associated with a high risk of avascular necrosis (AVN)--so-called unstable or acute slips; however, closed surgery makes confirmation of physeal stability difficult. Performing the capital realignment procedure in SCFE treatment we observed that clinical estimation of physeal stability did not always correlate with intraoperative findings at open surgery. This motivated us to perform a systematic comparison of the clinical classification systems with the intraoperative observations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Is the classification of an acute versus chronic slip based on the duration of symptoms sensitive and specific in detecting intraoperative disrupted physes in patients with SCFE? (2) Is the stable/unstable classification system based on clinical symptoms sensitive and specific in detecting intraoperative disrupted physes in patients with SCFE? METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients with SCFE treated by open surgery between 1996 and 2009. We classified the clinical stability of all hips using the classifications based on onset of symptoms and on function. We classified intraoperative stability as intact or disrupted. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of two classification systems to determine intraoperative stability. RESULTS: Complete physeal disruption at open surgery was seen in 28 of the 82 hips (34%). With classification as acute, acute-on-chronic, and chronic, the sensitivity for disrupted physes was 82% and the specificity was 44%. With the classification of Loder et al., the values were 39% and 76%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Current clinical classification systems are limited in accurately diagnosing the physeal stability in SCFE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: J G Kennedy; M T Hresko; J R Kasser; K B Shrock; D Zurakowski; P M Waters; M B Millis Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2001 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Kai Ziebarth; Christoph Zilkens; Samantha Spencer; Michael Leunig; Reinhold Ganz; Young-Jo Kim Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Eduardo N Novais; Daniel A Maranho; Travis Heare; Ernest Sink; Patrick M Carry; Courtney O'Donnel Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Paulo Rego; Vasco Mascarenhas; Inês Mafra; Filipe Oliveira; Pedro Pinto; Reinhold Ganz Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Eduardo N Novais; Shayan Hosseinzadeh; Seyed Alireza Emami; Daniel A Maranho; Young-Jo Kim; Ata M Kiapour Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.176