Efflux of newly synthesized cholesterol and biosynthetic sterol intermediates from cells. Dependence on acceptor type and on enrichment of cells with cholesterol.

Previous studies suggest that during sterol synthesis in cells, cholesterol and precusor sterols are transported to the plasma membrane and that this transport is stimulated by the binding of high density lipoprotein (HDL) to its putative cell surface receptor, leading to enhanced sterol efflux. Little is known about the identities of synthesized sterols subject to efflux or whether efflux of cholesterol and precursor sterols are stimulated equally by HDL. To address these issues, cells were incubated with [3H]acetate or [3H]mevalonate and sterol acceptors, and then the labeled sterols in cells and efflux media were analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography methods that resolved cholesterol and precursor sterols. In non-hepatic cells (Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), fibroblasts, and smooth muscle), cholesterol and multiple precursor sterols accumulated. In CHO cells, the major products were cholesterol and desmosterol, which together constituted 50% of labeled nonsaponifiable lipids. When media contained human HDL3 (1 mg of protein/ml), the molar efflux of synthesized desmosterol was four times that of cholesterol, and the 8-h efflux of these sterols, each normalized to its own production, averaged 48 and 16%, respectively. When media contained egg phosphatidylcholine vesicles (1 mg/ml), the efflux of these sterols averaged 18 and 2.4%, respectively. Thus, with both acceptors, desmosterol was the major synthesized sterol released from cells, and its efflux was substantially greater than that of synthesized cholesterol. High relative efflux of desmosterol (or a desmosterol-like sterol) occurred in all cell types and in both cholesterol-enriched and unenriched cells. These results demonstrated qualitatively similar efflux of synthesized sterols in the presence of HDL3 and phospholipid vesicles, arguing against an absolute requirement for acceptors that interact with the HDL receptor. To probe for possible quantitative differences in the capabilities of these two acceptors, the ratios of (efflux to HDL3)/(efflux to phosphatidylcholine vesicles) were calculated for synthesized cholesterol and desmosterol, plasma membrane cholesterol, and lysosomal cholesterol. In comparison to plasma membrane cholesterol, there was little or no HDL selectivity for lysosomal cholesterol or synthesized desmosterol, whereas there was a 2-3-fold selectivity for synthesized cholesterol, suggesting that the ability of HDL to enhance the efflux of synthesized sterols is a modest quantitative effect and confined to cholesterol.