Literature DB >> 7556095

Repression and activation of transcription by Gal and Lac repressors: involvement of alpha subunit of RNA polymerase.

H E Choy1, S W Park, T Aki, P Parrack, N Fujita, A Ishihama, S Adhya.   

Abstract

Gal or Lac repressor binding to an upstream DNA segment, in the absence of DNA looping, represses the P1 promoter located on the same face and activates the P2 promoter situated on the opposite face of the DNA helix in the gal operon. Both inhibition and stimulation of transcription requires the physical presence of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase although the latter is not required for transcription itself. We propose that Gal and Lac repressors inhibit or stimulate transcription initiation by disabling or stimulating RNA polymerase activity at a post-binding step by directly or indirectly altering the C-terminal alpha domain to an unfavorable state at P1 or a more favorable state at P2, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7556095      PMCID: PMC394544          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00131.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  43 in total

1.  RNA polymerase makes important contacts upstream from base pair -49 at the Escherichia coli galactose operon P1 promoter.

Authors:  S Busby; A Spassky; B Chan
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Purification and properties of Gal repressor:pL-galR fusion in pKC31 plasmid vector.

Authors:  A Majumdar; S Rudikoff; S Adhya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Mutations that reduce expression from the P2 promoter of the Escherichia coli galactose operon.

Authors:  A H Bingham; S Ponnambalam; B Chan; S Busby
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  lac Repressor blocks transcribing RNA polymerase and terminates transcription.

Authors:  U Deuschle; R Gentz; H Bujard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Probing the structure of gal operator-repressor complexes. Conformation change in DNA.

Authors:  A Majumdar; S Adhya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  E. coli RNA polymerase interacts homologously with two different promoters.

Authors:  U Siebenlist; R B Simpson; W Gilbert
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  lac repressor blocks in vivo transcription of lac control region DNA.

Authors:  M A Sellitti; P A Pavco; D A Steege
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Interaction of the cAMP receptor protein with the lac promoter.

Authors:  R B Simpson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The upstream operator of the Escherichia coli galactose operon is sufficient for repression of transcription initiated at the cyclic AMP-stimulated promoter.

Authors:  G Kuhnke; A Krause; C Heibach; U Gieske; H J Fritz; R Ehring
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Characterization of two mutations in the Escherichia coli galE gene inactivating the second galactose operator and comparative studies of repressor binding.

Authors:  H J Fritz; H Bicknäse; B Gleumes; C Heibach; S Rosahl; R Ehring
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  38 in total

1.  Mechanism of repression of the aroP P2 promoter by the TyrR protein of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Yang; P Wang; A J Pittard
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  An inactive open complex mediated by an UP element at Escherichia coli promoters.

Authors:  H Tagami; H Aiba
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Regulation of plastid rDNA transcription by interaction of CDF2 with two different RNA polymerases.

Authors:  M Bligny; F Courtois; S Thaminy; C C Chang; T Lagrange; J Baruah-Wolff; D Stern; S Lerbs-Mache
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-04-17       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Repression of deoP2 in Escherichia coli by CytR: conversion of a transcription activator into a repressor.

Authors:  M Shin; S Kang; S J Hyun; N Fujita; A Ishihama; P Valentin-Hansen; H E Choy
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  A regulatory protein that interferes with activator-stimulated transcription in bacteria.

Authors:  Shunji Nakano; Michiko M Nakano; Ying Zhang; Montira Leelakriangsak; Peter Zuber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  DNA trajectory in the Gal repressosome.

Authors:  Szabolcs Semsey; Michail Y Tolstorukov; Konstantin Virnik; Victor B Zhurkin; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Bacillus subtilis δ Factor Functions as a Transcriptional Regulator by Facilitating the Open Complex Formation.

Authors:  Ranjit Kumar Prajapati; Shreya Sengupta; Paulami Rudra; Jayanta Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Homologies and divergences in the transcription regulatory system of two related Bacillus subtilis phages.

Authors:  Laura Pérez-Lago; Margarita Salas; Ana Camacho
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  DNA looping-mediated repression by histone-like protein H-NS: specific requirement of Esigma70 as a cofactor for looping.

Authors:  Minsang Shin; Miryoung Song; Joon Haeng Rhee; Yeongjin Hong; You-Jin Kim; Yeong-Jae Seok; Kwon-Soo Ha; Se-Hui Jung; Hyon E Choy
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Operator sequence alters gene expression independently of transcription factor occupancy in bacteria.

Authors:  Hernan G Garcia; Alvaro Sanchez; James Q Boedicker; Melisa Osborne; Jeff Gelles; Jane Kondev; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.