Literature DB >> 12768424

Comparative analysis of leg and antenna development in wild-type and homeotic Drosophila melanogaster.

Mark Cummins1, Jose I Pueyo, Steve A Greig, Juan Pablo Couso.   

Abstract

The insect leg and antenna are thought to be homologous structures, evolved from a common ancestral appendage. The homeotic transformations of antenna to leg in Drosophila produced by mutation of the Hox gene Antennapedia are position-specific, such that every particular antenna structure is transformed into a specific leg counterpart. This has been taken to suggest that the developmental programmes of these two appendages are still similar. In particular, the mechanisms for the specification of a cell's position within the appendage would be identical, only their interpretation would be different and subject to homeotic gene control. Here we explore the degree of conservation between the developmental programmes of leg and antenna in Drosophila and other dipterans, in wild-type and homeotic conditions. Most of the appendage pattern-forming genes are active in both appendages, and their expression domains are partially conserved. However, the regulatory relationships and interactions between these genes are different, and in fact cells change their expression while undergoing homeotic transformation. Thus, the positional information, and the mechanisms which generate it, are not strictly conserved between leg and antenna; and homeotic genes alter the establishment of positional clues, not only their interpretation. The partial conservation of pattern-forming genes in both appendages ensures a predictable re-specification of positional clues, producing the observed positional specificity of homeotic transformations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12768424     DOI: 10.1007/s00427-003-0326-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genes Evol        ISSN: 0949-944X            Impact factor:   0.900


  28 in total

Review 1.  Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins.

Authors:  R S Mann; S K Chan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Molecular evidence for the gnathobasic derivation of arthropod mandibles and for the appendicular origin of the labrum and other structures.

Authors:  A Popadíc; G Panganiban; D Rusch; W A Shear; T C Kaufman
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Antenna to leg transformation: dynamics of developmental competence.

Authors:  E Larsen; T Lee; N Glickman
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1996

4.  Axis specification in the developing Drosophila appendage: the role of wingless, decapentaplegic, and the homeobox gene aristaless.

Authors:  G Campbell; T Weaver; A Tomlinson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-09-24       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Proximo-distal development in the legs of Drosophila.

Authors:  J P Couso; S A Bishop
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.203

6.  Formation and specification of distal leg segments in Drosophila by dual Bar homeobox genes, BarH1 and BarH2.

Authors:  T Kojima; M Sato; K Saigo
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Proximal-distal leg development in Drosophila requires the apterous gene and the Lim1 homologue dlim1.

Authors:  J I Pueyo; M I Galindo; S A Bishop; J P Couso
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  dachshund encodes a nuclear protein required for normal eye and leg development in Drosophila.

Authors:  G Mardon; N M Solomon; G M Rubin
Journal:  Development       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  How the Hox gene Ultrabithorax specifies two different segments: the significance of spatial and temporal regulation within metameres.

Authors:  J Castelli-Gair; M Akam
Journal:  Development       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Generation of multiple antagonistic domains along the proximodistal axis during Drosophila leg development.

Authors:  M Abu-Shaar; R S Mann
Journal:  Development       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  5 in total

1.  The evolution of patterning of serially homologous appendages in insects.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Jockusch; Terri A Williams; Lisa M Nagy
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2004-05-29       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Expression patterns of leg genes in the mouthparts of the spider Cupiennius salei (Chelicerata: Arachnida).

Authors:  Nikola-Michael Prpic; Wim G M Damen
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Control of Distal-less expression in the Drosophila appendages by functional 3' enhancers.

Authors:  Máximo Ibo Galindo; Diego Fernández-Garza; Rose Phillips; Juan Pablo Couso
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Drosophila distal-less and Rotund bind a single enhancer ensuring reliable and robust bric-a-brac2 expression in distinct limb morphogenetic fields.

Authors:  Aissette Baanannou; Luis Humberto Mojica-Vazquez; Gaylord Darras; Jean-Louis Couderc; David L Cribbs; Muriel Boube; Henri-Marc Bourbon
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Dynamic genome wide expression profiling of Drosophila head development reveals a novel role of Hunchback in retinal glia cell development and blood-brain barrier integrity.

Authors:  Montserrat Torres-Oliva; Julia Schneider; Gordon Wiegleb; Felix Kaufholz; Nico Posnien
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 5.917

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.