Literature DB >> 7555450

Prospective, multicenter study on value of computerized tomography (CT) in gallstone disease in predicting response to bile acid therapy.

M L Petroni1, R P Jazrawi, A Grundy, A Lanzini, M G Pigozzi, A Biasio, K W Heaton, J Virjee, T C Northfield.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the value of quantitative attenuation values (Hounsfield units) and of gallstone pattern by computerized tomography in predicting response to bile acid therapy. We carried out a prospective study in a multicenter setting on 90 consecutive outpatients with radiolucent gallstones. All received bile acid therapy (UDCA 10 mg/kg/day or UDCA + CDCA 5 mg/kg/day of each) up to two years. Hounsfield units for gallstones were recorded using standardized criteria and six categories of patterns were defined: hypodense, isodense, homogenously dense, laminated, rimmed and speckled. We assessed gallstone dissolution rate (percent reduction in volume), response to therapy (> 25% reduction in volume), and final outcome of therapy. Eighty-one percent of patients with hypodense/isodense and all four patients with speckled stone pattern responded to therapy, whereas none of the 10 patients with laminated/rimmed and only 45% of patients with homogenously dense stone pattern did. Complete dissolution was achieved by 68%, 50%, 35%, 0% of the hypodense/isodense, speckled, homogenously dense, rimmed/laminated gallstones, respectively. The use of Hounsfield units did not show an advantage over gallstone pattern for predicting either response or final outcome to bile acid therapy. We conclude that computerized tomography analysis of gallstones is of value in predicting response to bile acid therapy and that gallstone pattern alone predicts response in most cases without the need for quantitative assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7555450     DOI: 10.1007/bf02208664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  17 in total

1.  Role of CT in characterizing gallstones: an unsettled issue.

Authors:  R L Baron
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Gallstones: in vitro comparison of physical, radiographic, and ultrasonic characteristics.

Authors:  B A Carroll
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Evaluation of radiographic lucency or opaqueness of gallstones as a means of identifying cholesterol or pigment stones. Correlation of lucency or opaqueness with calcium and mineral.

Authors:  B W Trotman; E J Petrella; R D Soloway; H M Sanchez; T A Morris; W T Miller
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values.

Authors:  C Levi; J E Gray; E C McCullough; R R Hattery
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Optimum bile acid treatment for rapid gall stone dissolution.

Authors:  R P Jazrawi; M G Pigozzi; G Galatola; A Lanzini; T C Northfield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Cholelithiasis: evaluation with CT.

Authors:  J A Barakos; P W Ralls; S A Lapin; M B Johnson; D R Radin; P M Colletti; W D Boswell; J M Halls
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Inhibition of gallstone formation by sphincterotomy in the prairie dog: reversal by atropine.

Authors:  S W Hutton; C E Sievert; J A Vennes; W C Duane
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Chemical and morphologic characteristics of cholesterol gallstones that failed to dissolve on chenodiol. The National Cooperative Gallstone Study.

Authors:  H S Freilich; P F Malet; J S Schwartz; R D Soloway
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Computed tomographic analysis of gallstones. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M S Hickman; W H Schwesinger; J D Bova; W E Kurtin
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1986-03

10.  Postprandial gallbladder motor function: refilling and turnover of bile in health and in cholelithiasis.

Authors:  R P Jazrawi; P Pazzi; M L Petroni; N Prandini; C Paul; J A Adam; S Gullini; T C Northfield
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  6 in total

1.  Gallstone dissolution with oral bile acid therapy. Importance of pretreatment CT scanning and reasons for nonresponse.

Authors:  S P Pereira; M J Veysey; C Kennedy; S H Hussaini; G M Murphy; R H Dowling
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Usefulness of gallbladder ejection fraction estimation to predict the recurrence of biliary pain in patients with symptomatic gallstones who did not undergo cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sung Noh Hong; Jong Kyun Lee; Kyu Taek Lee; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Poong Lyul Rhee; Seung Woon Paik; Byung Chul Yoo; Jong Chul Rhee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 4.  Cholecystectomy versus no cholecystectomy in patients with silent gallstones.

Authors:  K S Gurusamy; K Samraj
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

Review 5.  Antioxidative and Antidiabetic Effects of Natural Polyphenols and Isoflavones.

Authors:  Aya Umeno; Masanori Horie; Kazutoshi Murotomi; Yoshihiro Nakajima; Yasukazu Yoshida
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Three Dimensional Ultra-short Echo Time MRI Can Depict Cholesterol Components of Gallstones Bright.

Authors:  Mamoru Takahashi; Yasuo Takehara; Kenji Fujisaki; Tomoyuki Okuaki; Yukiko Fukuma; Norihiro Tooyama; Katsutoshi Ichijo; Tomoyasu Amano; Satoshi Goshima; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.471

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.