Literature DB >> 6736062

A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loads.

A Freivalds, D B Chaffin, A Garg, K S Lee.   

Abstract

A biomechanical evaluation of the job-related stresses imposed upon a worker is a potential means of reducing the high incidence rates of manual material handling injuries in industry. A biomechanical model consisting of seven rigid links joined at six articulations has been developed for this purpose. Using data from cinematographic analysis of lifting motions the model calculates: (1) body position from articulation angles, (2) angular velocities and accelerations, (3) inertial moments and forces, and (4) reactive moments and forces at each articulation, including the L5/S1 joint. Results indicated effects of the common task variables. Larger load and box sizes increased the rise times and peak values of both vertical ground reaction forces and predicted L5/S1 compressive forces. However, boxes with handles resulted in higher L5/S1 compressive forces than for boxes without handles. Also, in lifting the larger boxes the subjects did not sufficiently compensate with reduced box weights in order to maintain uniform L5/S1 compressive forces. Smoothed and rectified EMG of erector spinae muscles correlated significantly with L5/S1 compressive forces, while predicted and measured vertical ground reaction forces also correlated significantly, indicating the validity of the model as a tool for predicting job physical stresses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6736062     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(84)90136-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of isokinetic lifting and free lifting when applied to chronic low back pain rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Bouilland; P Loslever; F X Lepoutre
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Mechanical demands on the lower back in patients with non-chronic low back pain during a symmetric lowering and lifting task.

Authors:  Iman Shojaei; Elizabeth G Salt; Quenten Hooker; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinae muscle loading during repetitive lifting.

Authors:  J R Potvin; R W Norman; S M McGill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

4.  Electromyography of lumbar erector spinae muscles--influence of posture, interelectrode distance, strength, and fatigue.

Authors:  R Rosenburg; H Seidel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1989

5.  Loads in the spinal structures during lifting: development of a three-dimensional comprehensive biomechanical model.

Authors:  J S Han; V K Goel; J Y Ahn; J Winterbottom; D McGowan; J Weinstein; T Cook
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Asymmetrical loads and lateral bending of the human spine.

Authors:  G Noone; J Mazumdar; D N Ghista; G D Tansley
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Isoinertial functional assessment of low-back disorders in pediatric nurses: Ergonomic and rehabilitation guidelines.

Authors:  P Carlier; F Vanderbecken; M Szpalski; J P Hayez
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1992-09

8.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL MULTI-SEGMENTED SPINE JOINT REACTION FORCES DURING COMMON WORKPLACE PHYSICAL DEMANDS/ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING.

Authors:  Scott P Breloff; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Biomed Eng (Singapore)       Date:  2017-08-14

9.  Effects of Gloves and Pulling Task on Achievable Downward Pull Forces on a Rung.

Authors:  Kurt E Beschorner; Gregory P Slota; Erika M Pliner; Egli Spaho; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Assessment of low back disorders risk based on allowable weight limits for manual lifting in Iran.

Authors:  Davood Afshari; Seyed Mahmood Latifi; Samira Kord; Maryam Nourollahi-Darabad
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.179

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.