Literature DB >> 7552618

Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery.

T J Kearney1, M Morrow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The success of lumpectomy and radiotherapy is dependent on minimizing the residual tumor burden in the breast. Histologic margin status is one measure of the extent of residual tumor. This study was undertaken to determine the success rate of a single conservative lumpectomy in obtaining negative margins and to evaluate the incidence of residual tumor after biopsies with positive or unknown margins.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study covering a 5-year period (June 1988-June 1993).
RESULTS: Three hundred sixteen women had lumpectomies. In 239, lumpectomy was the initial operation after a positive fine-needle aspiration or as a diagnostic procedure. Thirteen cases had positive margins. Reexcision was performed in 90 cases. The indication for reexcision was a positive margin in 42 cases (4 with gross tumor) and unknown margin status in 48. Nineteen of the reexcisions for positive margins and 20 of the reexcisions for unknown margins contained residual tumor. Eighty-six (96%) of the 90 reexcised patients underwent breast preserving surgery. Patient age, menopausal status, histologic tumor type, tumor size, and clinical presentation were not predictive of residual tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: The need for reexcision does not preclude breast preservation. Because single-stage lumpectomy is successful in achieving negative margins in 95% of patients, diagnostic biopsy without margin evaluation should be abandoned to avoid routine reexcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7552618     DOI: 10.1007/bf02307061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  15 in total

1.  The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  L J Solin; B L Fowble; D J Schultz; R L Goodman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; M A Rose; R T Osteen; S Love; B Cady; B Silver; A Recht; J R Harris
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Factors affecting cosmetic outcome in breast-conserving cancer treatment--objective quantitative assessment.

Authors:  R D Pezner; M P Patterson; J A Lipsett; T Odom-Maryon; N L Vora; J Y Wong; K H Luk
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Pathologic findings on re-excision of the primary site in breast cancer patients considered for treatment by primary radiation therapy.

Authors:  S J Schnitt; J L Connolly; U Khettry; G Mazoujian; M Brenner; B Silver; A Recht; G Beadle; J R Harris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Can the clinical and mammographic findings at presentation predict the presence of an extensive intraductal component in early stage breast cancer?

Authors:  E A Healey; R T Osteen; S J Schnitt; R Gelman; P C Stomper; J L Connolly; J R Harris
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy.

Authors:  M S Anscher; P Jones; L R Prosnitz; W Blackstock; M Hebert; R Reddick; A Tucker; R Dodge; G Leight; J D Iglehart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The optimal extent of resection for patients with stages I or II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  F A Vicini; T J Eberlein; J L Connolly; A Recht; A Abner; S J Schnitt; W Silen; J R Harris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early stage breast carcinoma.

Authors:  R Schmidt-Ullrich; D E Wazer; O Tercilla; H Safaii; D J Marchant; T J Smith; M A Homer; N J Robert
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Results of re-excisional biopsy of the primary tumor in preparation for definitive irradiation of patients with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  L J Solin; B Fowble; K Martz; T F Pajak; R L Goodman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D E Wazer; T DiPetrillo; R Schmidt-Ullrich; L Weld; T J Smith; D J Marchant; N J Robert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  6 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients.

Authors:  Eline E Deurloo; William F A Klein Zeggelink; H Jelle Teertstra; Johannes L Peterse; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Sara H Muller; Harry Bartelink; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Breast conservation for mammographically occult carcinoma.

Authors:  M Morrow; R A Schmidt; C Bucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Association of infiltrating lobular carcinoma with positive surgical margins after breast-conservation therapy.

Authors:  M M Moore; G Borossa; J Z Imbrie; R E Fechner; J A Harvey; C L Slingluff; R B Adams; J B Hanks
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Breast Conserving Therapy: A surgical Technique where Little can Mean More.

Authors:  Ganiyu A Rahman
Journal:  J Surg Tech Case Rep       Date:  2011-01

5.  Lumpectomy with or without postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer with favourable prognostic features: results of a randomized study.

Authors:  K Holli; R Saaristo; J Isola; H Joensuu; M Hakama
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance image-guided versus ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Pei-Hong Wu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.