Literature DB >> 1554891

Factors affecting cosmetic outcome in breast-conserving cancer treatment--objective quantitative assessment.

R D Pezner1, M P Patterson, J A Lipsett, T Odom-Maryon, N L Vora, J Y Wong, K H Luk.   

Abstract

A battery of objective measurements of cosmetic outcome was performed on 114 patients who had been treated by breast-preservation techniques for breast cancer. Cosmetic breast retraction, as determined by Breast Retraction Assessment (BRA) measurements, was significantly greater in patients who underwent extensive primary tumor resection, were more than 60 years old, weighed more than 150 lbs, or had a primary tumor in an upper breast quadrant. While use of a local RT boost, per se, was not a significant factor, those patients with high dose and/or large volume local boosts more frequently had marked retraction. Breast telangiectasia and depigmentation (T/D) was related to use of a local RT boost, patient age greater than 60 years, and use of separate nodal RT fields. Breast T/D was significantly more frequent with use of electron beam local RT boost which delivered a boost skin dose exceeding 1600 cGy. Objective quantitative assessments, such as BRA and T/D area measurements, provide data to determine factors related to each type of cosmetic change and thus provide guidelines for optimizing cosmetic outcome. Limiting the extent of primary tumor resection may minimize the amount of breast retraction. Omitting the local RT boost, particularly large volume, high dose boosts, may reduce the frequency of marked cosmetic retraction and skin T/D.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1554891     DOI: 10.1007/bf01834638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  23 in total

Review 1.  Now there are two effective conservation approaches for patients with stage I and II breast cancer: how pathological assessment of inked resection margins can provide valuable information for the radiation oncologist.

Authors:  R D Pezner; J Terz; J Ben-Ezra; L R Hill
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; M A Rose; R T Osteen; S Love; B Cady; B Silver; A Recht; J R Harris
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  The past and future of conservative treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Pierquin; L Marin
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.339

4.  A practical technique for the localization of the tumor volume in definitive irradiation of the breast.

Authors:  L J Solin; B F Danoff; G F Schwartz; J M Galvin; R L Goodman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Reappraisal of breast biopsy prompted by the use of lumpectomy. Surgical strategy.

Authors:  B Fisher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Cosmesis and local control after irradiation in women treated conservatively for breast cancer.

Authors:  R A Steeves; P Phromratanapongse; W H Wolberg; D C Tormey
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-12

7.  Arm lymphedema in patients treated conservatively for breast cancer: relationship to patient age and axillary node dissection technique.

Authors:  R D Pezner; M P Patterson; L R Hill; J A Lipsett; K R Desai; N Vora; J Y Wong; K H Luk
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; C Redmond; R Poisson; R Margolese; N Wolmark; L Wickerham; E Fisher; M Deutsch; R Caplan; Y Pilch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). II. Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity.

Authors:  E R Fisher; R Sass; B Fisher; R Gregorio; R Brown; L Wickerham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Breast retraction assessment. Multiple variable analysis of factors responsible for cosmetic retraction in patients treated conservatively for stage I or II breast carcinoma.

Authors:  R D Pezner; M P Patterson; L R Hill; N L Vora; K R Desai; J A Lipsett
Journal:  Acta Radiol Oncol       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug
View more
  7 in total

1.  Late Toxicity of Radiotherapy: A Problem or a Challenge for the Radiation Oncologist?

Authors:  Cordula Petersen; Florian Würschmidt
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Cosmetic outcome of breast conservative treatment for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  M Arenas; S Sabater; V Hernández; I Henríquez; A Ameijide; Ll Anglada; E Mur; M Artigues; A Lafuerza; J Borras
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Immediate breast reconstruction using autologous free dermal fat grafts provides better cosmetic results for patients with upper inner cancerous lesions.

Authors:  Yuko Kijima; Heiji Yoshinaka; Yawara Funasako; Koichi Kaneko; Munetsugu Hirata; Tadao Mizoguchi; Sumiya Ishigami; Hideo Arima; Akihiro Nakajo; Shinichi Ueno; Shoji Natsugoe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Effect of reexcision on the success of breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  T J Kearney; M Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Eun-Kyu Lee; Shin-Ho Kook; Yong-Lai Park; Won-Gil Bae
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Breast conservation therapy: local tumor control in patients with pathologically clear margins who receive 5000 cGy breast irradiation without local boost.

Authors:  R D Pezner; L D Wagman; J Ben-Ezra; T Odom-Maryon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Late effects of cancer treatment in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sushma Agrawal
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2014-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.