Literature DB >> 7546993

Atrial arrhythmias and pacing after orthotopic heart transplantation: bicaval versus standard atrial anastomosis.

S C Grant1, M A Khan, E B Faragher, N Yonan, N H Brooks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Right and left atrial configuration is more normal when the donor left atrium is anastomosed to a recipient left atrial cuff with direct anastomoses of the donor and recipient vena cavas on the right side. The right atrium and sinus node may be less disturbed by the technique of bicaval anastomosis than by the standard procedure.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of atrial arrhythmias and pacing after bicaval and standard anastomoses.
METHODS: 75 patients had heart transplants between January 1991 and December 1993. The notes were reviewed. Nine patients who died within the first 30 days were excluded from further analysis (seven patients with standard anastomoses, one with bicaval anastomosis, and one with a hybrid technique).
RESULTS: 66 patients survived for more than 30 days. Thirty five patients had standard anastomoses and 31 bicaval anastomoses. Atrial tachyarrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, or supraventricular tachycardia) occurred on four days in three patients in the bicaval group compared with 27 days in 13 patients in the standard group (P = 0.009). The relative risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias with standard anastomosis was 5.52 (P = 0.015) compared with that of bicaval anastomosis. Atrial tachyarrhythmias requiring treatment occurred less often in the bicaval group (four episodes in three patients in the bicaval group and eight episodes in four patients in the standard group), and fewer patients with a bicaval anastomosis required temporary pacing (pacing on 20 days in 10 patients in the bicaval group, but pacing on 49 days in 16 patients in the standard group) and late permanent pacing (no patients in the bicaval group and three patients in the standard group), although these differences were not statistically significant. Patients in the bicaval group were discharged from hospital sooner than those in the standard group (mean 24.1 v 29.1 days, P = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: The technique of bicaval anastomosis, in addition to theoretical advantages from maintaining a more normal atrial configuration, has a lower incidence of postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmias, may reduce the need for pacing, and allows earlier discharge from hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7546993      PMCID: PMC483990          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.74.2.149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  13 in total

1.  A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection: Heart Rejection Study Group. The International Society for Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  M E Billingham; N R Cary; M E Hammond; J Kemnitz; C Marboe; H A McCallister; D C Snovar; G L Winters; A Zerbe
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec

2.  Total orthotopic heart transplantation: an alternative to the standard technique.

Authors:  G Dreyfus; V Jebara; S Mihaileanu; A F Carpentier
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Atrioventricular orthotopic heart transplantation: a prospective randomised clinical trial in 60 consecutive patients.

Authors:  S W Kendall; F Ciulli; B Biocina; P A Mullins; P Schofield; F C Wells; J Wallwork; S R Large
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  An alternative surgical technique in orthotopic cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  M A Sarsam; C S Campbell; N A Yonan; A K Deiraniya; A N Rahman
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.620

5.  Alternative technique for orthotopic heart transplantation.

Authors:  C Blanche; L S Czer; M Valenza; A Trento
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Cardiac rhythm disturbances early after orthotopic heart transplantation: prevalence and clinical importance of the observed abnormalities.

Authors:  L Jacquet; G Ziady; K Stein; B Griffith; J Armitage; R Hardesty; R Kormos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Arrhythmias after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  C D Scott; J H Dark; J M McComb
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Sinus node dysfunction after orthotopic cardiac transplantation: postoperative incidence and long-term implications.

Authors:  G Heinz; M Hirschl; P Buxbaum; G Laufer; S Gasic; A Laczkovics
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Sinus node function in first three weeks after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  A F Mackintosh; D J Carmichael; C Wren; R Cory-Pearce; T A English
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1982-12

10.  Permanent pacing after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  C D Scott; J M McComb; J H Dark; R S Bexton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-05
View more
  9 in total

1.  Electroanatomical mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia originating from the recipient heart with recipient-to-donor atrio-atrial conduction after orthotopic heart transplantation.

Authors:  Bharat K Kantharia; Sabrina L Wilbur; Steven P Kutalek; Farooq A Padder
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia after orthotopic heart transplantation.

Authors:  F A Padder; S L Wilbur; B K Kantharia; A Lee; F Samuels; S P Kutalek
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Operative Technique and Atrial Tachyarrhythmias After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Srinivasan Sattiraju; Shashank Vats; Balaji Krishnan; Sun K Kim; Erin Austin; Ilknur Can; Venkatakrishna Tholakanahalli; David G Benditt; Lin Y Chen
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-12-16

4.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in a patient with orthotopic heart transplantation by bicaval anastomosis.

Authors:  Lissette Rodríguez de Armas; Margarita Dorantes; Jesús Castro; Francisco José Tornés; Julio César Rodríguez; Yanela Fayad; Javier Almeida
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Arrhythmias in the Heart Transplant Patient.

Authors:  David Hamon; Jane Taleski; Marmar Vaseghi; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Noel G Boyle
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-11-29

6.  Evolution of heart rate control after transplantation: conduction versus autonomic innervation.

Authors:  S Sanatani; C Chiu; D Nykanen; J Coles; L West; R Hamilton
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Risk factors and survival of patients with permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Rasmus Rivinius; Matthias Helmschrott; Ann-Kathrin Rahm; Fabrice F Darche; Dierk Thomas; Tom Bruckner; Andreas O Doesch; Philipp Ehlermann; Hugo A Katus; Edgar Zitron
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Atrial electromechanical delay in patients undergoing heart transplantation.

Authors:  Mustafa Bulut; Mert Evlice; Mehmet Celik; Hayati Eren; Ömer F Savluk; Rezzan D Acar; Mustafa Tabakci; Mehmet Y Emiroglu; Ozlem Otcu Nurse; Ramazan Kargin; Mehmet Balkanay; Mustafa Akcakoyun
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-09-14

Review 9.  Postoperative arrhythmias after cardiac surgery: incidence, risk factors, and therapeutic management.

Authors:  Giovanni Peretto; Alessandro Durante; Luca Rosario Limite; Domenico Cianflone
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 1.866

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.