Literature DB >> 1382274

Sinus node dysfunction after orthotopic cardiac transplantation: postoperative incidence and long-term implications.

G Heinz1, M Hirschl, P Buxbaum, G Laufer, S Gasic, A Laczkovics.   

Abstract

We investigated incidence, normalization rates, and clinical significance of sinus node (SN) dysfunction after cardiac transplantation. Thirty-nine of 90 patients systematically evaluated presented with impaired SN function in the postoperative period. Of these, 22 normalized their SN function during follow-up while 17 remained impaired after 3 months. The proportion normalized was higher in patients with prolonged SN recovery time (11/16, 68.8%) and those reverting from escape rhythm to sinus rhythm until discharge (5/8, 62.5%) when compared to patients in escape rhythm throughout the postoperative period (5/11, 45.5%) or pacemaker dependence (1/4, 25%). There was no reliable postoperative predictor of normalization and necessity of long-term pacing. A postoperative heart rate consistently less than 70 beats/min (irrespective of the native rhythm) was significantly related to outcome (P = 0.01), but revealed unacceptable sensitivity (61.5%) and specificity (81%). After all, both patients with severe symptoms (near syncopes and syncope), were derived from this group. These two patients, who had been discharged in sinus rhythm, had late pacemakers implanted. An additional 17 patients had early pacemaker placement, only seven of which were constantly paced during follow-up. Given the low normalization rates, patients with postoperative escape rhythm are those most likely to benefit from pacemaker therapy over the long term. Even those in, or reverting back to, sinus rhythm until discharge may experience severe symptoms, particularly in the setting of a postoperative rate consistently less than 70 beats/min since this indicates a relatively lower probability of recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1382274     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb06838.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  7 in total

1.  Nonpharmacologic validation of the intrinsic heart rate in cardiac transplant recipients.

Authors:  J S Strobel; A E Epstein; R C Bourge; J K Kirklin; G N Kay
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Permanent pacing after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  G Heinz
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-12

3.  Atrial arrhythmias and pacing after orthotopic heart transplantation: bicaval versus standard atrial anastomosis.

Authors:  S C Grant; M A Khan; E B Faragher; N Yonan; N H Brooks
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-08

4.  Stability of pacing indices and need for pacing in cardiac transplant patients over 1 year of follow-up.

Authors:  Talha A Farid; Mohamed A Omer; Kensey Gosch; Ashley Moser; Bethany Austin; Anthony Magalski; Alan P Wimmer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Risk factors and survival of patients with permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Rasmus Rivinius; Matthias Helmschrott; Ann-Kathrin Rahm; Fabrice F Darche; Dierk Thomas; Tom Bruckner; Andreas O Doesch; Philipp Ehlermann; Hugo A Katus; Edgar Zitron
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Postoperative care of the transplanted patient.

Authors:  Kurt R Schumacher; Robert J Gajarski
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2011-05

7.  Permanent pacemaker for syncope after heart transplantation with bicaval technique.

Authors:  Kyong Joo Lee; Yun Sook Jung; Chan Joo Lee; Jin Wi; Sanghoon Shin; Taehoon Kim; Sang Hak Lee; Seok-Min Kang; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Han Ki Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.759

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.