Literature DB >> 7546873

Confidentiality of medical records: the patient's perspective.

D Carman1, N Britten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of modern information technology and the increasing amount of multidisciplinary teamwork in primary health care mean that the principle of patient confidentiality is becoming difficult to uphold. The debate about confidentiality so far has paid little attention to patients' views. AIM: A qualitative study was undertaken to explore patients' expectations and attitudes concerning confidentiality of patients' medical records in general practice.
METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 39 patients from one general practice.
RESULTS: Patients' expectations diverged considerably from actual practice. The majority of interviewees felt that administrative and secretarial staff should not have access to medical records. Some patients had reservations about a doctor not directly involved in their care having access to their records. They were unaware of the fact that practice staff had ready access to their medical records. Interviewees had particular concerns about recording of nonmedical information in their records, and the confidentiality of computerized records.
CONCLUSION: Assumptions of shared doctor-patient definitions of confidentiality, at least in this practice, would be misplaced. It is suggested that explicit negotiations about what is recorded in patients' records would go some way to addressing the discrepancies identified in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7546873      PMCID: PMC1239373     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  8 in total

1.  Medical confidentiality and records in general practice.

Authors:  A C Markus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Giving patients their own records in general practice: experience of patients and staff.

Authors:  M Baldry; C Cheal; B Fisher; M Gillett; V Huet
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-01

3.  Confidentiality expectations of patients, physicians, and medical students.

Authors:  B D Weiss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Medical confidence, the law, and computers: discussion paper.

Authors:  P Sieghart
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Sounding Boards. Confidentiality in medicine--a decrepit concept.

Authors:  M Siegler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Patient access to records: expectations of hospital doctors and experiences of cancer patients.

Authors:  B Fisher; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Consultants' and patients' views about patient access to their general practice records.

Authors:  N Britten; J Bartholomew; R Morris; L Zander
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 18.000

8.  Patient access to psychiatric records: the patients' view.

Authors:  J Parrott; G Strathdee; P Brown
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 18.000

  8 in total
  18 in total

1.  The UMDS MSc in general practice: attainment of intended outcomes.

Authors:  G Calvert; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Involving patients in medical education.

Authors:  Amanda Howe; Janie Anderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-09

3.  Data protection, informed consent, and research: Interpretation of legislation should reflect patients' views.

Authors:  Jonathan Fletcher; Joanna Marriott; David Phillips
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-12

4.  Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent.

Authors:  Bruce Campbell; Helen Thomson; Jessica Slater; Colin Coward; Katrina Wyatt; Kieran Sweeney
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-12

5.  Concerns over confidentiality may deter adolescents from consulting their doctors. A qualitative exploration.

Authors:  J Carlisle; D Shickle; M Cork; A McDonagh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Patients' knowledge and expectations of confidentiality in primary health care: a quantitative study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Needs of disabled children and their families.

Authors:  J Milner; C Bungay; D Jellinek; D M Hall
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Do electronic health records affect the patient-psychiatrist relationship? A before & after study of psychiatric outpatients.

Authors:  Randall F Stewart; Philip J Kroth; Mark Schuyler; Robert Bailey
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 9.  Patient perspectives of medical confidentiality: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar; Susan Mora; Jon F Merz; Nora L Jones
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.

Authors:  M R Robling; K Hood; H Houston; R Pill; J Fay; H M Evans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.