Literature DB >> 7546334

Amphetamine-induced hyperactivity: differences between rats with high or low preference for alcohol.

C Fahlke1, E Hård, C J Eriksson, J A Engel, S Hansen.   

Abstract

This study determined the relationship between ethanol intake and spontaneous and amphetamine-induced locomotor activity. Locomotion was studied in high-preferring (HP; > 70% of total fluid intake consumed as alcohol) and low-preferring (LP; < 20% of total fluid intake consumed as alcohol) male Wistar rats with free access to water and a 6% (v/v) ethanol solution for 3 weeks. Following an alcohol-free 3-week period, the animals were tested for spontaneous motor activity for 1 h. One week later, locomotion was recorded in the same activity boxes following a subcutaneous injection with d-amphetamine sulfate (1 mg/kg). For determination of plasma levels of corticosterone, blood samples were taken immediately after each of the two tests for locomotor activity. There was no difference between HP and LP rats with regard to spontaneous locomotor activity. Neither were there any differences in plasma levels of corticosterone between the groups. Amphetamine stimulated locomotion in both HP and LP rats, but to a significantly greater extent in HP animals. Both groups had higher blood levels of corticosterone after the amphetamine test than after the drug-free test, but the corticosterone increase was significantly larger in the HP than in the LP rats. These data indicate that the same neural substrate (e.g., the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system) may mediate important aspects of both ethanol drinking and amphetamine responsiveness. Individual differences in the properties of this substrate may account for the finding that ethanol drinking and amphetamine responsiveness covary. A possible explanation for this association may be that prior consumption of ethanol sensitizes the neural substrate responsible for amphetamine-induced hyperactivity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7546334     DOI: 10.1016/0741-8329(95)00019-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol        ISSN: 0741-8329            Impact factor:   2.405


  8 in total

1.  Amphetamine modifies ethanol intake of psychosocially stressed male rats.

Authors:  Larissa A Pohorecky; April Sweeny
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Stress-induced changes in mood and cortisol release predict mood effects of amphetamine.

Authors:  Ajna Hamidovic; Emma Childs; Megan Conrad; Andrea King; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Combined and sequential effects of alcohol and methamphetamine in animal models.

Authors:  Alexandra M Stafford; Bryan K Yamamoto; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Differential involvement of anxiety and novelty preference levels on oral ethanol consumption in rats.

Authors:  Yann Pelloux; Jean Costentin; Dominique Duterte-Boucher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The amphetamine response moderates the relationship between negative emotionality and alcohol use.

Authors:  Kenneth J D Allen; Frances H Gabbay
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Ethanol-mediated aversive learning as a function of locomotor activity in a novel environment in infant Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Carlos Arias; Juan Carlos Molina; Norman E Spear
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Voluntary ethanol consumption changes anticipatory ultrasonic vocalizations but not novelty response.

Authors:  Erik J Garcia; Emily T Jorgensen; Lukas S Sprick; Mary E Cain
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Lack of relation between drug-seeking behavior in an addiction model and the expression of behavioral sensitization in response to ethanol challenge in mice.

Authors:  A F Ribeiro; G Pigatto; F O Goeldner; J F Lopes; R B de Lacerda
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 3.575

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.