Literature DB >> 7542823

The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy-based staging, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score in prediction of final pathologic diagnosis in prostate cancer.

P Narayan1, V Gajendran, S P Taylor, A Tewari, J C Presti, R Leidich, R Lo, K Palmer, K Shinohara, J T Spaulding.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of ultra sound-guided systematic and lesion-directed biopsies, biopsy gleason score, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as three objective and reproducible variables to provide a reliable combination in preoperative identification of risk of extraprostatic extension in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
METHODS: The case records of 813 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer were analyzed. All had multiple systematic biopsies, two to three from each lobe, in addition to lesion-directed biopsies. Additionally, biopsies were done on seminal vesicles (SVs), if abnormal. Based on biopsy results, patients were classified as having stage B1 (T2a-T2b) or B2 (T2c) disease, depending on whether biopsies from one or both lobes were positive and stage C (T3) if there was evidence of SV involvement by biopsy of biopsies from areas of extracapsular extension as seen on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) were positive. Logistic regression analyses with log likelihood chi-square test was used to define the correlation between individual as well as combination of preoperative variables and pathologic stage.
RESULTS: On final pathologic examination, 473 (58%) patients had organ-confined disease, 188 (23%) had extracapsular extension (ECE), with or without positive surgical margins, and 72 (9%) had SV involvement. Eighty (10%) patients had pelvic lymph node metastases. Biopsy-based staging was superior to clinical staging in predicting final pathologic diagnosis. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the combination of biopsy-based stage, preoperative serum PSA, and biopsy Gleason score provided the best prediction of final pathologic stage. Probability plots constructed with these data can provide significant information on risk of extraprostatic extension in individual patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that TRUS-guided systematic biopsy in combination with preoperative serum PSA and biopsy Gleason score may provide a cost-effective approach for management decisions and prognostication in patients with prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7542823     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80195-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  15 in total

Review 1.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Definition of the CTV prostate in CT and MRI by using CT-MRI image fusion in IMRT planning for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Hentschel; Wolfgang Oehler; Dirk Strauss; Andreas Ulrich; Ansgar Malich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Early diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

Review 4.  Imaging techniques: new avenues in cancer gene and cell therapy.

Authors:  Z Saadatpour; A Rezaei; H Ebrahimnejad; B Baghaei; G Bjorklund; M Chartrand; A Sahebkar; H Morovati; H R Mirzaei; H Mirzaei
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.987

Review 5.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Nomograms for the prediction of pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in Korean men.

Authors:  Cheryn Song; Taejin Kang; Jae Y Ro; Moo-Song Lee; Choung-Soo Kim; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Can we predict real T3 stage prostate cancer in patients with clinical T3 (cT3) disease before radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 8.  [Serum markers for early detection and staging of prostate cancer. Status report on current and future markers].

Authors:  A Haese; M Graefen; J Palisaar; E Huland; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Pathological correlation between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad A Bulbul; Yaser El-Hout; Maurice Haddad; Ayman Tawil; Ali Houjaij; Nizar Bou Diab; Oussama Darwish
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  The relationship between preoperative prostate-specific antigen and biopsy Gleason sum in men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: a novel assessment of traditional predictors of outcome.

Authors:  Phillip Pierorazio; Manisha Desai; Tara McCann; Mitchell Benson; James McKiernan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.