Literature DB >> 3033161

High-dose induction chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

D H Johnson, M J DeLeo, K R Hande, S N Wolff, J D Hainsworth, F A Greco.   

Abstract

To exploit possible dose-response and combination drug synergism, 20 previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received one or two courses of high-dose induction chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg), etoposide (1,200 mg/m2), and cisplatin (120 mg/m2) (HDCEP). HDCEP was followed by four cycles of standard-dose cyclophosphamide (1,000 mg/m2), doxorubicin (40 mg/m2), and vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) (CAV). Response was determined after HDCEP and following CAV. Reevaluation included repeat bronchoscopy and chest computerized tomography (CT), as well as repetition of all initially abnormal studies. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Overall response to HDCEP was 90%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 65% (95% confidence limits, 44% to 86%) and a partial response (PR) rate of 25% (95% confidence limits, 6% to 44%). All patients either maintained or improved their initial response while receiving CAV. Median duration of response was 6 months (range, 2 to 12 months) and median survival was 9.5 + months (range, 2 to 21 + months). All 37 courses of HDCEP were associated with leukopenia (less than 1,000/microL), 92% with thrombocytopenia (less than 20,000/microL), and 84% with fever of greater than 38.5 degrees C. Additional toxicities included bacteremia (24%), nausea and emesis (59%), mucositis (57%), diarrhea (38%), and hemorrhagic cystitis (5%). There were two treatment-related deaths due to infection. A third patient died 4 months after completing HDCEP with pulmonary fibrosis. Although response duration and median survival were not improved, HDCEP produced a high CR rate in ambulatory patients with extensive-stage SCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3033161     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.5.703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

1.  Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cisplatin, VP-16 and radiation therapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  C Collins; C S Higano; R B Livingston; B R Griffin; M D Keppen; T P Miller
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Phase II feasibility study of high dose epirubicin plus etoposide and cisplatin (HDEEC) regimen in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  R Rosell; J Carles; A Abad; J M Jimeno; I Moreno; A Barnadas; N Ribelles; N Haboubi
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide combination chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J Aisner; M Y Whitacre; D R Budman; K Propert; G Strauss; D A Van Echo; M Perry
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Enhanced efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in selected cases of surgically resected neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sixia Xie; Liang Song; Fan Yang; Chendian Tang; Shaoyan Yang; Ji He; Xiaoling Pan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Circulating hematopoietic progenitors in patients with primary lung cancer.

Authors:  E Shimizu; J N Mukai; Y Takaue; T Ogura
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1990-12

6.  Intensification of chemotherapy for the treatment of solid tumours: feasibility of a 3-fold increase in dose intensity with peripheral blood progenitor cells and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  S Leyvraz; N Ketterer; L Perey; J Bauer; P Vuichard; J P Grob; P Schneider; V von Fliedner; F Lejeune; F Bachmann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.