Literature DB >> 7533458

Citrate as an in vivo marker to discriminate prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate peripheral zone: detection via localized proton spectroscopy.

J Kurhanewicz1, D B Vigneron, S J Nelson, H Hricak, J M MacDonald, B Konety, P Narayan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether citrate levels detected by localized 1H spectroscopy could reliably discriminate regions of prostate adenocarcinoma from surrounding regions of normal peripheral zone and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
METHODS: In 28 patients and 5 volunteers stimulated echo proton spectroscopy was used in conjunction with endorectal surface coils to obtain water-suppressed 1H spectra from regions of normal prostate peripheral zone, BPH, and prostate cancer. 1H spectra from prostate cancer patients were correlated with pathologic areas identified on T2-weighted endorectal coil magnetic resonance (MR) images and histologic study of the step-sectioned gland after surgery.
RESULTS: The major finding of in vivo studies was consistently lower citrate levels in prostate cancer compared with BPH and normal prostate peripheral zone. This was reflected by significantly (P < 0.05) lower mean citrate/(creatine plus choline) peak area ratio observed for regions of cancer (0.67 +/- 0.17) compared with BPH (1.21 +/- 0.29) and normal peripheral zone (1.46 +/- 0.28). Moreover, there was no overlap of individual cancer and normal peripheral zone citrate ratios and no significant difference between citrate ratios in regions of normal peripheral zone in young volunteers (1.28 +/- 0.14) and age-matched patients (1.46 +/- 0.28). The observed alterations in vivo citrate levels were supported by citrate concentration data obtained from extracts of histologically proven samples of normal, benign, and malignant prostatic tissues removed at surgery. In vitro citrate levels in the normal peripheral zone (30.9 +/- 8.5 mumol/g wet weight) and BPH (46.3 +/- 5.4 mumol/g wet weight) were significantly higher than those for prostate cancer (3.74 +/- 0.54 mumol/g wet weight).
CONCLUSIONS: These studies further demonstrate the potential of citrate as an in vivo marker for discriminating prostate cancer from surrounding regions of normal peripheral zone and BPH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7533458     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80016-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  35 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of brain and prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Kurhanewicz; D B Vigneron; S J Nelson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Investigation of the PSF-choice method for reduced lipid contamination in prostate MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Lawrence P Panych; Joseph R Roebuck; Nan-kuei Chen; Yi Tang; Bruno Madore; Clare M Tempany; Robert V Mulkern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with locally confined prostate cancer: association of prostatic citrate and metabolic atrophy with time on hormone deprivation therapy, PSA level, and biopsy Gleason score.

Authors:  Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Mark G Swanson; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Two-dimensional MR spectroscopy of healthy and cancerous prostates in vivo.

Authors:  M Albert Thomas; Thomas Lange; S Sendhil Velan; Rajakumar Nagarajan; Steve Raman; Ana Gomez; Daniel Margolis; Stephany Swart; Raymond R Raylman; Rolf F Schulte; Peter Boesiger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Removal of the outer lines of the citrate multiplet in proton magnetic resonance spectra of the prostatic gland by accurate timing of a point-resolved spectroscopy pulse sequence.

Authors:  M van der Graaf; G J Jager; A Heerschap
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Prostate 3T-MR spectroscopic imaging without an endorectal surface coil using the MLEV-PRESS sequence.

Authors:  Takeshi Yoshizako; Koji Uchida; Shinji Hara; Yasushi Kaji; Masahiro Sumura; Mikio Igawa; Hajime Kitagaki; Mitsuhiro Uike; Tsuyoshi Matsuda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer clinical application.

Authors:  Bing Li; Yong Du; Hanfeng Yang; Yayong Huang; Jun Meng; Dongmei Xiao
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Proton MR spectroscopy of prostatic tissue focused on the detection of spermine, a possible biomarker of malignant behavior in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M van der Graaf; R G Schipper; G O Oosterhof; J A Schalken; A A Verhofstad; A Heerschap
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping and spectroscopy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Kyle Petrowski; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12

10.  A meta-analysis of the accuracy of prostate cancer studies which use magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Peng Wang; You-min Guo; Min Liu; Yong-qian Qiang; Xiao-juan Guo; Yi-li Zhang; Xiao-Yi Duan; Qiu-Juan Zhang; Weifeng Liang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.