Literature DB >> 7523084

Objective detection of 40 Hz auditory evoked potentials: phase coherence vs. magnitude-squared coherence.

R A Dobie1, M J Wilson.   

Abstract

The relative performance of phase coherence (PC) and magnitude-squared coherence (MSC) for detection of steady-state evoked potentials was studied using 40 Hz auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in 10 normal human subjects. In addition, simulation experiments were carried out to determine the effects of signal amplitude and phase variability on detection performance. All simulations showed MSC performance to be better than PC performance, with further improvements when MSC was supplemented with weighted averaging. However, human 40 Hz AEP data showed essentially identical detection performance for PC and MSC, with or without weighted averaging. These data support a "phase aggregation" model (at least near threshold) over the more usual model in which an AEP signal is added to a stationary noise. Human data collected under "no-stimulus" conditions agree well with theoretical distributions for both PC and MSC. For equal test time, long analysis periods (with less averaging) yielded equal performance to short analysis periods (with more averaging), for both PC and MSC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7523084     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90017-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  8 in total

1.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Improving the power of objective response detection of evoked responses in noise by using average and product of magnitude-squared coherence of two different signals.

Authors:  Tiago Zanotelli; Antonio Mauricio Ferreira Leite Miranda de Sá; Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marçal Mendes; Leonardo Bonato Felix
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Fluctuation of gamma-band phase synchronization within the auditory cortex in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Keeran Maharajh; Peter Teale; Donald C Rojas; Martin L Reite
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  The power of rhythms: how steady-state evoked responses reveal early neurocognitive development.

Authors:  Claire Kabdebon; Ana Fló; Adélaïde de Heering; Richard Aslin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 7.400

7.  Neurodevelopment and asymmetry of auditory-related responses to repetitive syllabic stimuli in preterm neonates based on frequency-domain analysis.

Authors:  Farveh Daneshvarfard; Hamid Abrishami Moghaddam; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Guy Kongolo; Fabrice Wallois; Mahdi Mahmoudzadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Electroencephalographic Signatures of the Neural Representation of Speech during Selective Attention.

Authors:  Vibha Viswanathan; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-10-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.