Literature DB >> 7520287

Prostate cancer in Rochester, Minnesota (USA), from 1935 to 1989: increases in incidence related to more complete ascertainment.

E H Corder1, C G Chute, H A Guess, C M Beard, W M O'Fallon, M M Lieber.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer incidence among White men in the United States climbed steadily from 45 per 10(5) person-years (PY) during 1945-54 to 102 per 10(5) PYs in 1988. To determine whether this increase might be the result of changing diagnostic practices, we examined trends in incidence and method of diagnosis in Rochester, Minnesota (US), from 1935 to 1989. We found a parallel increase in Rochester in non-autopsy diagnoses from 44 (95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 29-58) cases per 10(5) PYs in 1935-44 to 71 (CI = 52-89) cases per 10(5) PYs in 1985-87 which was driven by diagnoses prompted by digital rectal examination. There was no evidence that an increasing proportion of cases was found as the result of procedures to treat the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Including autopsy diagnoses, incidence was stable over this extended interval and was 77 per 10(5) PYs (CI = 58-97) in 1935-44 and 72 per 10(5) PYs (CI = 53-91) in 1985-87. Incidence more than doubled after introduction of diagnostic serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay and was 179 per 10(5) PYs (CI = 145-214) in 1988-89. We conclude that prostate-cancer incidence rates are influenced strongly by diagnostic practices and that national increases could reflect, to a large extent, more complete and earlier ascertainment rather than more frequent disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7520287     DOI: 10.1007/bf01830238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  7 in total

1.  Rise in prostatic cancer incidence associated with increased use of transurethral resection.

Authors:  A L Potosky; L Kessler; G Gridley; C C Brown; J W Horm
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-10-17       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  An anatomy of the autopsy, Olmsted County, 1935 through 1985.

Authors:  P N Nemetz; D J Ballard; C M Beard; J Ludwig; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen; K M Weigel; P G Belau; W M Bourne; L T Kurland
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Cancer statistics, 1993.

Authors:  C C Boring; T S Squires; T Tong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  The patient record in epidemiology.

Authors:  L T Kurland; C A Molgaard
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.142

Review 5.  Carcinoma of the prostate: a review.

Authors:  W J Catalona; W W Scott
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; T L Ratliff; K M Dodds; D E Coplen; J J Yuan; J A Petros; G L Andriole
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The Consensus Development Program. Detecting changes in medical practice following a consensus conference on the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C R Sherman; A L Potosky; K A Weis; J H Ferguson
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.188

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Modern-day prostate cancer is not meaningfully associated with lower urinary tract symptoms: Analysis of a propensity score-matched cohort.

Authors:  Amar Bhindi; Bimal Bhindi; Girish S Kulkarni; Robert J Hamilton; Ants Toi; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Andrew Evans; Alexandre R Zlotta; Antonio Finelli; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.