Literature DB >> 28443144

Modern-day prostate cancer is not meaningfully associated with lower urinary tract symptoms: Analysis of a propensity score-matched cohort.

Amar Bhindi1, Bimal Bhindi2, Girish S Kulkarni2, Robert J Hamilton2, Ants Toi3, Theodorus H van der Kwast4, Andrew Evans4, Alexandre R Zlotta2, Antonio Finelli2, Neil E Fleshner2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine if prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with worse lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) than matched benign prostates, with attention to cancer characteristics, in a contemporary cohort.
METHODS: Using a single-institution database (January 1, 2009-June 30, 2013), men diagnosed with PCa on biopsy and controls with negative biopsies were matched 1:1 on age, prostate volume, and a propensity score predicting the probability of PCa diagnosis. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was compared between PCa cases and controls using paired statistics, stratifying on grade, cancer volume, stage, and D'Amico risk group. Sensitivity analyses were performed separately, repeating the match for high-grade, high-volume, and high-stage cancers only, and excluding users of benign prostatic hyperplasia medications.
RESULTS: In our cohort of 1330 men (665 with PCa), there were 284 (42.7%) Gleason 6 cancers (Grade Group 1), 315 (47.4%) Gleason 7 cancers (Grade Group 2-3), and 66 (9.9%) Gleason 8-10 cancers (Grade Group 4-5). There was no difference in IPSS between PCa cases (median 6.5, interquartile range [IQR] 3-12) and benign controls (median 7, IQR 3-13; p=0.34). Subgroup analyses based on cancer grade, volume, or stage, showed no significant differences in IPSS between men with and without PCa, except among men with cT2b-cT4 PC (median 9, IQR 5-16) vs. matched benign counterparts (median 8, IQR 3-12; p=0.03). Sensitivity analyses supported these findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Modern PCa does not appear to be associated with worse LUTS compared to benign prostates of the same size. Outlet obstruction is likely a late event in the natural history of PCa. This has implications for timely PCa detection, which should ideally be prior to the onset of LUTS.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28443144      PMCID: PMC5403675          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  28 in total

1.  The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association.

Authors:  M J Barry; F J Fowler; M P O'Leary; R C Bruskewitz; H L Holtgrewe; W K Mebust; A T Cockett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF CANCER IN THE BLADDER, PROSTATE AND KIDNEY.

Authors:  J C McClelland
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1934-08       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Dissecting the association between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer risk: analysis of a large clinical cohort.

Authors:  Bimal Bhindi; Jennifer Locke; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Girish S Kulkarni; David S Margel; Robert J Hamilton; Antonio Finelli; John Trachtenberg; Alexandre R Zlotta; Ants Toi; Karen M Hersey; Andrew Evans; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Relationship of prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume in patients with biopsy proven benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  D A Hochberg; N A Armenakas; J A Fracchia
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study.

Authors:  Debra E Irwin; Ian Milsom; Steinar Hunskaar; Kate Reilly; Zoe Kopp; Sender Herschorn; Karin Coyne; Con Kelleher; Christian Hampel; Walter Artibani; Paul Abrams
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Evaluation and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in older men.

Authors:  P Abrams; C Chapple; S Khoury; C Roehrborn; J de la Rosette
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Current clinical presentation and treatment of localized prostate cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Usama Mahmood; Lawrence B Levy; Paul L Nguyen; Andrew K Lee; Deborah A Kuban; Karen E Hoffman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prostate cancer trends in Canada: rising incidence or increased detection?

Authors:  I G Levy; L Gibbons; J P Collins; D G Perkins; Y Mao
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Capsular penetration in prostate cancer. Significance for natural history and treatment.

Authors:  J E McNeal; A A Villers; E A Redwine; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Prostate Cancer in Primary Care.

Authors:  Samuel W D Merriel; Garth Funston; Willie Hamilton
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Samuel W D Merriel; Lucy Pocock; Emma Gilbert; Sam Creavin; Fiona M Walter; Anne Spencer; Willie Hamilton
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 3.  De Novo Detrusor Underactivity and Other Urodynamic Findings after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maciej Oszczudłowski; Konrad Bilski; Mieszko Kozikowski; Jakub Dobruch
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.