Literature DB >> 7520172

Mode of action of anti-lipopolysaccharide-binding protein antibodies for prevention of endotoxemic shock in mice.

P Gallay1, D Heumann, D Le Roy, C Barras, M P Glauser.   

Abstract

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) has been shown to regulate the response of monocytes to LPS in vitro. In a previous study, polyclonal anti-LBP IgGs were found to protect D-galactosamine-sensitized mice against a lethal endotoxemic shock induced by a low challenge of LPS or lipid A when administered simultaneously with endotoxin. In the present study, we investigated the mode of action of these anti-LBP IgGs. In vitro, we demonstrated that they interfere with LPS binding to monocytes or polymorphonuclear cells in different ways: by the mere prevention of binding of LPS to LBP thus preventing the binding of LPS to CD14, or by reacting with LPS-LBP complexes thus mediating their binding to complement or Fc receptors on monocytes and on polymorphonuclear cells. In vivo, we demonstrated that anti-LBP IgGs afforded protection against lethal endotoxemic shock by one of two mechanisms. First, LBP blockade by pretreatment with anti-LBP IgG allowed protection against a low dose of LPS (100 ng). This protection occurred despite LPS levels in blood similar to those in control mice but in the absence of detectable tumor necrosis factor (TNF). This demonstrated that anti-LBP IgG could block the LBP-mediated TNF release upon LPS challenge. In contrast, anti-LBP IgG did not afford protection in mice not sensitized with D-galactosamine and challenged with high-dose LPS (1 mg), confirming that LPS at high concentrations could stimulate cells independently of the LBP pathway. Second, anti-LBP treatment administered simultaneously with LPS challenge protected mice against both low and high doses of LPS. Unlike after pretreatment with anti-LBP IgG, this protection was accompanied by a decrease of circulating LPS, suggesting that anti-LBP IgG in these conditions facilitated clearance of LPS probably by clearing LPS-LBP complexes. These data and the fact that LBP binds to all LPS through lipid A suggest that antibody directed to LBP could be a candidate for therapeutic strategies in endotoxemic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7520172      PMCID: PMC44516          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.7922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

Review 1.  Septic shock: pathogenesis.

Authors:  M P Glauser; G Zanetti; J D Baumgartner; J Cohen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-09-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Gram-negative endotoxin: an extraordinary lipid with profound effects on eukaryotic signal transduction.

Authors:  C R Raetz; R J Ulevitch; S D Wright; C H Sibley; A Ding; C F Nathan
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  The role of cytokine mediators in septic shock.

Authors:  K J Tracey; S F Lowry
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  1990

4.  Structure and function of lipopolysaccharide binding protein.

Authors:  R R Schumann; S R Leong; G W Flaggs; P W Gray; S D Wright; J C Mathison; P S Tobias; R J Ulevitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-09-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  CD14, a receptor for complexes of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS binding protein.

Authors:  S D Wright; R A Ramos; P S Tobias; R J Ulevitch; J C Mathison
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-09-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Antibodies to core lipopolysaccharide determinants: absence of cross-reactivity with heterologous lipopolysaccharides.

Authors:  D Heumann; J D Baumgartner; H Jacot-Guillarmod; M P Glauser
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Passive immunization against cachectin/tumor necrosis factor protects mice from lethal effect of endotoxin.

Authors:  B Beutler; I W Milsark; A C Cerami
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein as a major plasma protein responsible for endotoxemic shock.

Authors:  P Gallay; D Heumann; D Le Roy; C Barras; M P Glauser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Control of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) binding and LPS-induced tumor necrosis factor secretion in human peripheral blood monocytes.

Authors:  D Heumann; P Gallay; C Barras; P Zaech; R J Ulevitch; P S Tobias; M P Glauser; J D Baumgartner
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Association between protective efficacy of anti-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antibodies and suppression of LPS-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6. Comparison of O side chain-specific antibodies with core LPS antibodies.

Authors:  J D Baumgartner; D Heumann; J Gerain; P Weinbreck; G E Grau; M P Glauser
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  The biology of endotoxin.

Authors:  H Heine; E T Rietschel; A J Ulmer
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Influence of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein on pulmonary inflammation in gram-negative pneumonia.

Authors:  Michael A Taddonio; Vladislav Dolgachev; Markus Bosmann; Peter A Ward; Grace Su; Stewart C Wang; Mark R Hemmila
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 3.  The inflammatory cytokines. New developments in the pathophysiology and treatment of septic shock.

Authors:  M P Glauser
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  LPS-binding protein protects mice from septic shock caused by LPS or gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  N Lamping; R Dettmer; N W Schröder; D Pfeil; W Hallatschek; R Burger; R R Schumann
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms of endotoxin activity.

Authors:  J Schletter; H Heine; A J Ulmer; E T Rietschel
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.552

Review 6.  Treatment of sepsis: past and future avenues.

Authors:  J D Baumgartner; T Calandra
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Ceftiofur regulates LPS-induced production of cytokines and improves LPS-induced survival rate in mice.

Authors:  Xinxin Ci; Hongyu Li; Yu Song; Na An; Qinlei Yu; Fanqin Zeng; Xuming Deng
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.092

8.  Activation of human endothelial cells by viable or heat-killed gram-negative bacteria requires soluble CD14.

Authors:  R F Noel; T T Sato; C Mendez; M C Johnson; T H Pohlman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 9.  Receptors, mediators, and mechanisms involved in bacterial sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Edwin S Van Amersfoort; Theo J C Van Berkel; Johan Kuiper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Antagonistic antibody prevents toll-like receptor 2-driven lethal shock-like syndromes.

Authors:  Guangxun Meng; Mark Rutz; Matthias Schiemann; Jochen Metzger; Alina Grabiec; Ralf Schwandner; Peter B Luppa; Frank Ebel; Dirk H Busch; Stefan Bauer; Hermann Wagner; Carsten J Kirschning
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.