Literature DB >> 7519406

Aftereffects of high-intensity DC stimulation on the electromechanical performance of ventricular muscle.

I Kodama1, N Shibata, I Sakuma, K Mitsui, M Iida, R Suzuki, Y Fukui, S Hosoda, J Toyama.   

Abstract

To clarify the mechanisms underlying cardiac dysfunction after electrical defibrillation, we investigated the effects of direct current field stimulation (10 ms, 1-80 V/cm) on isolated guinea pig papillary muscles. Shocks (S2) > 15 V/cm lowered the plateau height of the S2-induced action potential and inhibited its terminal repolarization. Subsequent responses to basic stimuli (S1, 1.0 Hz) for 1-3 min were characterized by a decrease in the maximum diastolic potential, a shortening of action potential duration, and an increase of the developed tension. With S2 > 30 V/cm, a marked delay in repolarization of the S2-induced action potential was followed by oscillation of membrane potential, resulting in repetitive spontaneous activity and often refractoriness to S1 stimulation. The aftereffects were independent of the phase of S2 application. Most of the aftereffects were preserved in the presence of nifedipine (1 microM) or ryanodine (1 microM). Only sodium channel blockade by tetrodotoxin (10 microM) modified the aftereffects by depressing the generation of spontaneous activity. These findings suggest that strong shocks (> 15 V/cm) will produce abnormal arrhythmogenic responses probably through a transient rupture of sarcolemmal membrane (electroporation) leading to a disturbance of the ionic equilibrium of the myocyte.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7519406     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1994.267.1.H248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  14 in total

1.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Electroporation induced by internal defibrillation shock with and without recovery in intact rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Yves T Wang; Igor R Efimov; Yuanna Cheng
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Drawing the curtain on the isoelectric window?

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Authors:  Vadim V Fedorov; Geran Kostecki; Matt Hemphill; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Irreversible electroporation: Proceed with caution.

Authors:  Kedar K Aras; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Ventricular tachycardia initiated by high energy cardioversion in a patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  M Chinushi; Y Aizawa; K Higuchi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Ionic mechanism of shock-induced arrhythmias: role of intracellular calcium.

Authors:  Brittany Sowell; Vladimir G Fast
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Chronaxie of defibrillation: a pathway toward further optimization of defibrillation waveform?

Authors:  Igor R Efimov
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-14

9.  Low K+-induced hyperpolarizations trigger transient depolarizations and action potentials in rabbit ventricular myocytes.

Authors:  M Akuzawa-Tateyama; M Tateyama; R Ochi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Spatial distribution and extent of electroporation by strong internal shock in intact structurally normal and chronically infarcted rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Seok C Kim; Amit Vasanji; Igor R Efimov; Yuanna Cheng
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.