Literature DB >> 7517285

Corneal power correction factor for photorefractive keratectomy.

R B Mandell1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of corneal power changes resulting from photorefractive keratectomy generally rely on keratometer or videokeratograph measurements. These instruments convert corneal radius of curvatures values to optical powers by means of the single refracting surface formula, which incorporates an index of refraction value of 1.3375. This index approximates that of the tears but not the 1.376 index of the corneal epithelium or stroma. A hypothetical optical model was used to determine the most appropriate index to be chosen with respect to corneal power calculations relative to photorefractive keratectomy.
METHODS: The contribution of each refractive element in the tear lens-corneal surface to the total power of the eye was calculated in order to identify which index of refraction was most appropriate for the corneal power calculation.
RESULTS: The outer tear surface has significant optical power but the tear layer as a whole has nearly zero power due to the offsetting negative power of the posterior test surface. There is no significant difference in the effective power of light leaving the corneal anterior surface when considered with or without the tear layer. Photorefractive keratectomy changes the epithelium and anterior surface of the corneal stroma, but does not affect the posterior stroma or other ocular media. Hence the refractive index for the corneal epithelium or stroma of 1.376 should be used in converting radius to optical power values. The error in assuming a corneal index of 1.3375 is a constant proportion equal to 11.4% of the corneal power reading.
CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy presents a situation in which the actual corneal refractive index of 1.376 should be used for correct corneal radius to power conversions. This may be accomplished by changing the index value in the instrument algorithm for keratometry and videokeratography to 1.376 or by adding a correction factor of either 11.4% of the regular reading to its value or multiplying by the factor 1.114. In other applications of keratometry or videokeratography, the index 1.3375 may be more appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7517285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Corneal Surg        ISSN: 1081-0803


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Li Wang; Marc A Booth; Douglas D Koch
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

2.  Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic and hyperopic laser vision correction using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Maolong Tang; Li Wang; Douglas D Koch; Yan Li; David Huang
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

3.  Assessing the effects of riboflavin/UV-A crosslinking on porcine corneal mechanical anisotropy with optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Manmohan Singh; Jiasong Li; Zhaolong Han; Raksha Raghunathan; Achuth Nair; Chen Wu; Chih-Hao Liu; Salavat Aglyamov; Michael D Twa; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Applanation optical coherence elastography: noncontact measurement of intraocular pressure, corneal biomechanical properties, and corneal geometry with a single instrument.

Authors:  Manmohan Singh; Zhaolong Han; Achuth Nair; Alexander Schill; Michael D Twa; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  An intraocular lens power calculation formula based on optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.

Authors:  Maolong Tang; Yan Li; David Huang
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Hyperopia correction by noncontact holmium: YAG laser thermal keratoplasty: five-pulse treatments with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  T Kohnen; R Villarreal; R Menefee; M Berry; D D Koch
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Effects of Thickness on Corneal Biomechanical Properties Using Optical Coherence Elastography.

Authors:  Srilatha Vantipalli; Jiasong Li; Manmohan Singh; Salavat R Aglyamov; Kirill V Larin; Michael D Twa
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Optical coherence elastography assessment of corneal viscoelasticity with a modified Rayleigh-Lamb wave model.

Authors:  Zhaolong Han; Jiasong Li; Manmohan Singh; Chen Wu; Chih-Hao Liu; Raksha Raghunathan; Salavat R Aglyamov; Srilatha Vantipalli; Michael D Twa; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-11-05

9.  Noncontact Elastic Wave Imaging Optical Coherence Elastography for Evaluating Changes in Corneal Elasticity Due to Crosslinking.

Authors:  Manmohan Singh; Jiasong Li; Srilatha Vantipalli; Shang Wang; Zhaolong Han; Achuth Nair; Salavat R Aglyamov; Michael D Twa; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.544

10.  Optical coherence tomography-based corneal power measurement and intraocular lens power calculation following laser vision correction (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  David Huang; Maolong Tang; Li Wang; Xinbo Zhang; Rebecca L Armour; Devin M Gattey; Lorinna H Lombardi; Douglas D Koch
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.