Literature DB >> 7516262

The New American Joint Committee on Cancer and International Union Against Cancer TNM classification of prostate cancer. Clinicopathologic correlations.

M Ohori1, T M Wheeler, P T Scardino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer and International Union Against Cancer TNM classification system for prostate cancer includes categories for the increasingly common nonpalpable cancers detected by serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), but few details have been published about the pathologic features and prognosis of such cancers.
METHODS: We analyzed the clinical and pathologic features of 400 patients with clinical Stages T1-T3, NO or NX, M0 cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. We compared volume, grade, extension, and prognosis of cancers detected by PSA or TRUS to those detected by the traditional techniques of transurethral resection (TURP) or digital rectal examination.
RESULTS: As clinical stage increased in the TNM classification, the volume, grade, and frequency of extraprostatic spread increased significantly. The 33 nonpalpable, nonvisible tumors detected because of an elevated PSA (T1c) were similar in size and frequency of extension to TURP-detected (T1a-b) cancers, but more often were poorly differentiated (52% vs. 22%) (P < 0.03). No T1c cancer has recurred to date. Nonpalpable T2 cancers detected by TRUS (n = 42) were significantly more likely (47% vs. 18%) to extend outside the prostate than were T1c cancers. Compared to palpable T2 cancers, TRUS-detected T2 cancers were smaller but were similar in grade, extension, and prognosis. T3 cancers were extensive and recurred rapidly; only 6% were confined to the prostate. In contrast, 24% of the T1 and 57% of the T2 cancers were not confined (> or = pT3), but only 6-9% of T1-T2a cancers exhibited advanced pathologic features (seminal vesicle invasion or lymph node metastases), compared with 26% of the T2b-c cancers.
CONCLUSION: The new TNM staging system provides appropriate new categories for inclusion of nonpalpable cancers detected by PSA and ultrasound. This new classification is logical and generally reflects the pathologic extent and prognosis of these tumors, although cancers in the advanced T2 categories are often more extensive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7516262     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940701)74:1<104::aid-cncr2820740119>3.0.co;2-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  System for MR image-guided prostate interventions: canine study.

Authors:  Robert C Susil; Axel Krieger; J Andrew Derbyshire; Attila Tanacs; Louis L Whitcomb; Gabor Fichtinger; Ergin Atalar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Life course sun exposure and risk of prostate cancer: population-based nested case-control study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Gilbert; Chris Metcalfe; Steven E Oliver; David C Whiteman; Chris Bain; Andy Ness; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; J Athene Lane; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Associations of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D with prostate cancer diagnosis, stage and grade.

Authors:  Rebecca Gilbert; Chris Metcalfe; William D Fraser; Jenny Donovan; Freddie Hamdy; David E Neal; J Athene Lane; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Prognostic significance of Bcl-2 in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  L Bubendorf; G Sauter; H Moch; P Jordan; A Blöchlinger; T C Gasser; M J Mihatsch
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  The value of serum prostate specific antigen and other parameters in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Ataus; A Citçi; B Alici; A U Onder; K Sönmezoğlu; A Erözenci; V Solok
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  A classifier integrating plasma biomarkers and radiological characteristics for distinguishing malignant from benign pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Yanli Lin; Qixin Leng; Zhengran Jiang; Maria A Guarnera; Yun Zhou; Xueqi Chen; Heping Wang; Wenxian Zhou; Ling Cai; HongBin Fang; Jie Li; Hairong Jin; Linghui Wang; Shaoqiong Yi; Wei Lu; David Evers; Carol B Fowle; Yun Su; Feng Jiang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Molecular genetics of prostate cancer: new prospects for old challenges.

Authors:  Michael M Shen; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  The Gordon Wilson Lecture. Natural history and treatment of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  P T Scardino
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2000

9.  Height and prostate cancer risk: a large nested case-control study (ProtecT) and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luisa Zuccolo; Ross Harris; David Gunnell; Steven Oliver; Jane Athene Lane; Michael Davis; Jenny Donovan; David Neal; Freddie Hamdy; Rebecca Beynon; Jelena Savovic; Richard Michael Martin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Clinical presentation and initial management of black men and white men with prostate cancer in the United Kingdom: the PROCESS cohort study.

Authors:  S Evans; C Metcalfe; B Patel; F Ibrahim; K Anson; F Chinegwundoh; C Corbishley; D Gillatt; R Kirby; G Muir; V Nargund; R Popert; P Wilson; R Persad; Y Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.