Literature DB >> 7515247

Rehabilitation for the terminal cancer patient.

H Yoshioka1.   

Abstract

A study was made of 301 terminal cancer patients who received physical therapy in the hospice facility during a period of 6 1/2 years. Of 239 patients with activities of daily living disturbance, the average transfer and locomotion score on the Barthel mobility index (maximum score 47) was 12.4 before beginning the physical therapy program. Later, after activities of daily living exercises, at their maximum level these patients reached an average score of 19.9. Response to a questionnaire was obtained from 169 families of decreased patients; 149 patients (88%) had indicated a desire for ambulation or mobility by wheelchair; 166 patients (98%) were satisfied with the hospice care; 132 patients (78%) were satisfied with the rehabilitation in the terminal stage; 107 patients (63%) considered the terminal rehabilitation procedures to be effective. The more fully patients discussed the physical therapy program with the therapist, the more effective and more satisfactory the rehabilitation was judged to be. Families actively participating in the rehabilitation assessed it as more effective, more satisfactory to the patients and more useful in overall patient care than those who did not participate at all. This study shows that rehabilitation can make an important contribution to the care of the terminal cancer patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7515247     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199406000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  18 in total

1.  Multiprofessional team approach in palliative care units in Japan.

Authors:  Etsuko Maeyama; Masako Kawa; Mitsunori Miyashita; Taketoshi Ozawa; Noriko Futami; Yuriko Nakagami; Chieko Sugishita; Keiko Kazuma
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Physical activity in patients with advanced-stage cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Tara A Albrecht; Ann Gill Taylor
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 1.027

3.  Nutritional status of cancer patients and its relationship to function in an inpatient rehabilitation setting.

Authors:  Ying Guo; J Lynn Palmer; Guddi Kaur; Susan Hainley; Beth Young; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  A framework for assessment in oncology rehabilitation.

Authors:  Laura S Gilchrist; Mary Lou Galantino; Meredith Wampler; Victoria G Marchese; G Stephen Morris; Kirsten K Ness
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-01-15

5.  Prevalence of unmet needs and correlated factors in advanced-stage cancer patients receiving rehabilitation.

Authors:  Takaaki Hasegawa; Naoya Goto; Naoto Matsumoto; Yusuke Sasaki; Takashi Ishiguro; Nanori Kuzuya; Yasuyuki Sugiyama
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Is exercise ignored in palliative cancer patients?

Authors:  Sibel Eyigor; Sedef Akdeniz
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

7.  THE STATE OF CANCER REHABILITATION.

Authors:  Jack Fu
Journal:  J Palliat Care Med       Date:  2012-05-18

8.  Physical exercise and therapy in terminally ill cancer patients: a retrospective feasibility analysis.

Authors:  Wiebke Jensen; Laura Bialy; Gesche Ketels; Freerk T Baumann; Carsten Bokemeyer; Karin Oechsle
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Cancer rehabilitation: a barometer for survival?

Authors:  Takako Saotome; Linda Klein; Steven Faux
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  The role of palliative rehabilitation in the preservation of personhood at the end of life.

Authors:  L K R Krishna; C Y L Yong; S M C Koh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.