Literature DB >> 7512472

Trandolapril. How does it differ from other angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors?

F Zannad1.   

Abstract

Among the physicochemical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that differentiate trandolapril from other angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, the most clinically relevant ones are those that contribute to the long duration of action of the drug. The long elimination half-life of trandolapril and its strong lipophilicity, high ACE inhibitor potency and high affinity for the ACE cause the drug to have a long biological half-life. The long duration of action of trandolapril may be demonstrated experimentally; near total ACE inhibition is observed 24 hours after single dose administration and there is significant ACE inhibition 72 hours following drug withdrawal after long term therapy. We have analysed the duration of blood pressure lowering during long term therapy with commercially available ACE inhibitors in published studies using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. On the basis of results from 19 studies undertaken in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, it was possible to reconstruct the curve of the magnitude of blood pressure changes against time. Mean trough: peak ratio calculations showed that once-daily administration produced ratios higher than 50% with enalapril (40 to 80%), lisinopril (40 to 70%) and trandolapril (50 to 100%). Other ACE inhibitors had trough: peak ratios lower than 50%. Despite many methodological limitations, this literature analysis demonstrates that trandolapril has a blood pressure-lowering effect for the full 24-hour period. Studies in which a dose is occasionally omitted show that the blood pressure-lowering effect of trandolapril may last beyond 24 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7512472     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199300462-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  40 in total

1.  Twenty-four hour blood pressure effect of once-daily lisinopril, enalapril, and placebo in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  A Whelton; B Dunne; N Glazer; J B Kostis; W E Miller; D J Rector; O N Tresznewsky
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Effect of atenolol or enalapril on diurnal changes of blood pressure in Japanese mild to moderate hypertensives: a double-blind, randomised, crossover trial.

Authors:  T Takabatake; H Ohta; Y Yamamoto; Y Ishida; H Hara; S Nakamura; H Takakuwa; K Kobayashi
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Pharmacokinetics of the converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril in normal volunteers and the relationship to enzyme inhibition: development of a mathematical model.

Authors:  R J Francis; A N Brown; L Kler; T Fasanella d'Amore; J Nussberger; B Waeber; H R Brunner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 4.  Circadian blood pressure variations and their impact on disease.

Authors:  G Mancia; G Parati; F Albini; A Villani
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension.

Authors:  G Parati; G Pomidossi; F Albini; D Malaspina; G Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 6.  Documentation of the effective length of action of antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  M A Weber
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-09-25       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Assessing duration of antihypertensive effects with whole-day blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  D G Cheung; J L Gasster; M A Weber
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-09

8.  Diurnal blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension treated with once-daily benazepril hydrochloride.

Authors:  M H Weinberger; H R Black; K C Lasseter; G P Lewis; C M MacLeod; A V Pascual; P G Zager; J DeSilva; L A Gourley; D A Bennett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Comparison of antihypertensive therapies by noninvasive techniques.

Authors:  W F Graettinger; J L Lipson; R C Klein; D G Cheung; M A Weber
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Assessment of the daily blood pressure load as a determinant of cardiac function in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Authors:  W B White; H M Dey; P Schulman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  5 in total

1.  Trough/peak ratios for antihypertensive agents. The issues in perspective.

Authors:  P A Meredith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  The implications of noncompliance with antihypertensive medication.

Authors:  B Girvin; G D Johnston
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Ramipril. An updated review of its therapeutic use in essential hypertension and heart failure.

Authors:  J E Frampton; D H Peters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Choosing the right ACE inhibitor. A guide to selection.

Authors:  G Leonetti; C Cuspidi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Impact of carboxylesterase 1 genetic polymorphism on trandolapril activation in human liver and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Xinwen Wang; Lucy Her; Jingcheng Xiao; Jian Shi; Audrey H Wu; Barry E Bleske; Hao-Jie Zhu
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.689

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.