Literature DB >> 2673118

Assessing duration of antihypertensive effects with whole-day blood pressure monitoring.

D G Cheung1, J L Gasster, M A Weber.   

Abstract

The whole-day blood pressure response to once-daily and twice-daily administration of a combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide was measured in a study of elderly patients (aged 59 to 78 years) with mild to moderate hypertension. Whole-day automated ambulatory blood pressure profiles were obtained at baseline, after 8 weeks of therapy with a combination of 25 mg of captopril and 15 mg of hydrochlorothiazide twice daily, and again after 8 weeks of once-daily therapy with 50 mg of captopril and 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide. Average systolic and diastolic whole-day blood pressures significantly decreased from baseline during both twice-daily treatment (mean +/- SEM change, 18 [+/- 3]/10 [+/- 2] mm Hg) and once-daily treatment (11 [+/- 2]/9 [+/- 1] mm Hg). While the decrease in systolic blood pressure during once-daily therapy was less than that during twice-daily therapy for the group as a whole, 16 of 19 patients achieved normal systolic (less than 140 mm Hg) and diastolic (less than 90 mm Hg) blood pressures throughout the day during the once-daily regimen. During once-daily therapy, the blood pressure reductions were sustained throughout the 24-hour period, and were not attenuated during the final 2 to 4 hours before the next dose. A subgroup of 5 patients were identified who appeared unresponsive to both twice-daily and once-daily antihypertensive treatment. Despite hypertensive office-measured blood pressures at entry to the study, 4 of these 5 patients actually had normotensive whole-day blood pressure averages at baseline (mean, 131 [+/- 7]/81 [+/- 4] mm Hg). Thus, whole-day ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a valuable tool for testing treatment responses. It demonstrated that once-daily treatment with low doses of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide was as effective as twice-daily administration in decreasing diastolic pressures throughout the day, but was slightly less effective in decreasing systolic pressures. Additionally, the monitoring identified apparently normotensive patients in whom treatment may not be indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2673118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  4 in total

1.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the evaluation of once-daily ACE inhibition: a comparison study of captopril and enalapril combined with hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  A von Pölnitz; H M Lorenz; B Höfling
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.727

2.  The response to the first dose of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor in uncomplicated hypertension--a placebo controlled study utilising ambulatory blood pressure recording.

Authors:  R J MacFadyen; A D Bainbridge; K R Lees; J L Reid
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Trandolapril. How does it differ from other angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors?

Authors:  F Zannad
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  The antihypertensive efficacy of losartan and amlodipine assessed with office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Canadian Cozaar Hyzaar Amlodipine Trial Study Group.

Authors:  T W Wilson; Y Lacourcière; C C Barnes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-09-08       Impact factor: 8.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.