Literature DB >> 7509274

A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models.

P Berg1, M Scherg.   

Abstract

Using a combination of 3 suitably located dipoles in a homogeneous sphere, the scalp potential due to a dipole source in a 4-shell spherical head model can be approximated with a high degree of precision and a more than 30-fold increase in computing speed. Magnitudes and locations of the 3 equivalent dipoles can be fitted in a homogeneous sphere to data generated from a source at one location in a 4-shell head model. The resulting parameters are used to compute scalp potentials for sources at other locations and orientations. Residual variance measures showed close agreement between the new approximation and a standard 4-shell computation method. Further tests of the method used scalp data from 500 randomly selected pairs of sources generated by the standard 4-shell computation and fitted using, for forward computations, the new approximation and the single-shell Ary-corrected head model. Errors with the new approximation were marginally larger than with the standard computation, but sources were located within 0.5 mm and 0.6 degrees of the original position in 99% of the fits. 99% error limits for the Ary model were up to 18 mm and 25 degrees and depended on the head model parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7509274     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90113-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  46 in total

1.  Task-dependent changes in cortical excitability and effective connectivity: a combined TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Bornali Kundu; Adenauer G Casali; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.

Authors:  Samuel A Inverso; Xin-Lin Goh; Linda Henriksson; Simo Vanni; Andrew C James
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Tao Song; Donald J Hagler; Igor Podgorny; Veikko Jousmaki; Li Cui; Kathleen Gaa; Deborah L Harrington; Anders M Dale; Roland R Lee; Jeff Elman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Brain source localization using a fourth-order deflation scheme.

Authors:  Laurent Albera; Anne Ferréol; Delphine Cosandier-Rimélé; Isabelle Merlet; Fabrice Wendling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Effect of configural distortion on a face-related ERP evoked by random dots blinking.

Authors:  Kensaku Miki; Shoko Watanabe; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Mika Teruya; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The on-line processing of socio-emotional information in prototypical scenarios: inferences from brain potentials.

Authors:  Hartmut Leuthold; Ruth Filik; Kirsty Murphy; Ian G Mackenzie
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Assessing recurrent interactions in cortical networks: Modeling EEG response to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jui-Yang Chang; Matteo Fecchio; Andrea Pigorini; Marcello Massimini; Giulio Tononi; Barry D Van Veen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Effector selection precedes reach planning in the dorsal parietofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Bernier; Matthew Cieslak; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  EEG responses to TMS are sensitive to changes in the perturbation parameters and repeatable over time.

Authors:  Silvia Casarotto; Leonor J Romero Lauro; Valentina Bellina; Adenauer G Casali; Mario Rosanova; Andrea Pigorini; Stefano Defendi; Maurizio Mariotti; Marcello Massimini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Re-entrant projections modulate visual cortex in affective perception: evidence from Granger causality analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Keil; Dean Sabatinelli; Mingzhou Ding; Peter J Lang; Niklas Ihssen; Sabine Heim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.