Literature DB >> 7505979

Using PSA to eliminate the staging radionuclide bone scan. Significant economic implications.

J E Oesterling1.   

Abstract

The findings of these two large-scale clinical studies indicate that serum PSA is an accurate and reliable predictor of the bone scan findings for 40% of the patients presenting with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer. For these patients with no skeletal symptoms and a serum PSA value of 10 ng/mL or less by either the Tandem-R or the IMx assay, a staging radionuclide bone scan is not necessary, as it provides no additional useful information over what is learned from the serum PSA value. If these bone scans were eliminated for these selected patients, approximately $38 million could be saved annually in the United States. As the incidence of newly diagnosed prostate cancer continues to increase, so will the economic savings associated with using the serum PSA concentration to predict the bone scan findings in appropriate patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7505979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  8 in total

Review 1.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Cryotherapy.

Authors:  Katsuto Shinohara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Risk factors for metastatic prostate cancer: A sentinel event case series.

Authors:  Channing J Paller; Alexander P Cole; Alan W Partin; Michael A Carducci; Norma F Kanarek
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 4.  The economic costs of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

Review 6.  Updated trends in imaging use in men diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Authors:  S P Porten; A Smith; A Y Odisho; M S Litwin; C S Saigal; P R Carroll; M R Cooperberg
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Prostate-specific antigen cutoff value for ordering sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography bone scan in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ismet Sarikaya; Ali Sarikaya; Abdelhamid H Elgazzar; Vuslat Yurut Caloglu; Prem Sharma; Ali Baqer; Murat Caloglu; Mahmoud Alfeeli
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Imaging in genitourinary cancer from the urologists' perspective.

Authors:  P Tsakiris; J de la Rosette
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 3.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.