Literature DB >> 7505193

Positive margins after radical prostatectomy: correlation with local recurrence and distant progression.

D van den Ouden1, F M Bentvelsen, E R Boevé, F H Schröder.   

Abstract

The impact of positive and negative surgical margins of resection on the interval to and incidence of progression was analysed in 172 patients after radical retropubic prostatectomy combined with lymphadenectomy; 56 had positive margins. Lateral and apical positive margins were evaluated separately. The status of surgical margins was correlated with other prognostic factors, such as the T category, the presence or absence of seminal vesicle invasion and the G category. This analysis showed that positive and negative margins significantly influenced time to progression independently of the other prognostic factors. Positive margins at the apex contrary to lateral margins did not significantly influence time to progression. This may be due to the definition of the status of apical margins used in this analysis. A total of 108 patients underwent a nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, which did not lead to a higher incidence of positive margins than the standard procedure. Prostate specific antigen accurately predicted tumour recurrence after radical prostatectomy. A rise of > or = 1.0 ng/ml preceded other evidence of recurrence by a mean of 11 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7505193     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16183.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  12 in total

1.  Detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  F H Schröder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-21

2.  Ethnic variation in pelvimetric measures and its impact on positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christian von Bodman; Mika P Matikainen; Luis Herran Yunis; Vincent Laudone; Peter T Scardino; Oguz Akin; Farhang Rabbani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence.

Authors:  R E Emerson; M O Koch; T D Jones; J K Daggy; B E Juliar; L Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Beyond the margins: real-time detection of cancer using targeted fluorophores.

Authors:  Ray R Zhang; Alexandra B Schroeder; Joseph J Grudzinski; Eben L Rosenthal; Jason M Warram; Anatoly N Pinchuk; Kevin W Eliceiri; John S Kuo; Jamey P Weichert
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Characteristics of Detected and Missed Prostate Cancer Foci on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Using an Endorectal Coil Correlated With Whole-Mount Thin-Section Histopathology.

Authors:  Nelly Tan; Daniel J Margolis; David Y Lu; Kevin G King; Jiaoti Huang; Robert E Reiter; Steven S Raman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: strike early, strike hard! The case for adjuvant radiation therapy.

Authors:  Dov Kadmon
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

7.  Prostate cancer with bladder neck involvement: pathologic findings with application of a new practical method for tumor extent evaluation and recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Athanase Billis; Leandro L L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Adil B Samara; Ubirajara Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  The significance of microscopic bladder neck invasion in radical prostatectomies: pT4 disease?

Authors:  Thais Ruano; Luciana Meirelles; Leandro L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Ubirajara Ferreira; Athanase Billis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic positive margins: incidence, site, factors involved, and time to PSA progression following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Athanase Billis; Isabela C Watanabe; Matheus V Costa; Gilliat H Telles; Luis A Magna
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.