Literature DB >> 7504850

Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.

C A Gomez1, M S Soloway, F Civantos, T Hachiya.   

Abstract

To modify the bladder neck dissection during radical prostatectomy, in an effort to improve continence and diminish the incidence of anastomotic stricture, without compromising the primary surgical objective of complete cancer removal. Between December 1991 and August 1992, 50 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and most proximal portion of the prostatic urethra, thus creating a mucosal cuff for anastomosis to the urethral stump. There was tumor at the inked margin in 18 patients (36%), however, in only 3 instances (6%) was there tumor at the bladder neck margin. In no instance was the bladder neck margin the only positive margin. At a minimum follow-up of six months, all patients are fully continent during routine activities, and in no patient has an anastomotic stricture developed. Anatomic dissection and preservation of the bladder neck and proximal urethra does not compromise surgical margins. We believe this technique may play a role in preservation of continence after radical prostatectomy and probably decreases the likelihood of anastomotic stricture, by allowing for a circumferential mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis without the need for bladder neck reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7504850     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90534-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  The Null Effect of Bladder Neck Size on Incontinence Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Jacob Ark; Justin R Gregg; Niels V Johnsen; Stephen F Kappa; Daniel J Lee; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The impact of bladder neck mucosal eversion during open radical prostatectomy on bladder neck stricture and urinary extravasation.

Authors:  Gita M Schoeppler; Dirk Zaak; Dirk-Andre Clevert; Petra Schuhmann; Oliver Reich; Michael Seitz; Wael Y Khoder; Michael Staehler; Christian G Stief; Alexander Buchner
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: positive surgical margin and urinary continence status.

Authors:  Tomasz Golabek; Jaroslaw Jaskulski; Piotr Jarecki; Przemysław Dudek; Tomasz Szopiński; Piotr Chłosta
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 4.  Bladder neck preservation improves time to continence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xueyou Ma; Kun Tang; Chunguang Yang; Guanqing Wu; Nan Xu; Meng Wang; Xing Zeng; Zhiquan Hu; Ranran Song; Bertram Yuh; Zhihua Wang; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11

5.  Bladder neck sparing during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Six-year experience.

Authors:  Sercan Yilmaz; Esat Ak; Eymen Gazel; Serdar Yalcin; Kenan Yigit Yildiz; Lutfi Tunc
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2021-05-24

6.  Bladder neck preservation during classic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - point of technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Piotr L Chłosta; Tomasz Drewa; Jarosław Jaskulski; Jakub Dobruch; John Varkarakis; Andrzej Borówka
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 1.195

7.  Bladder neck sparing in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michal Smolski; Rachel C Esler; Rafal Turo; Gerald N Collins; Neil Oakley; Richard Brough
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-10

Review 8.  Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mariangela Bellangino; Clare Verrill; Tom Leslie; Richard W Bell; Freddie C Hamdy; Alastair D Lamb
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.092

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.