Literature DB >> 7503471

A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women.

M Genç1, A Mårdh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of identifying and treating asymptomatic female carriers of Chlamydia trachomatis.
DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis based on previously reported cohort analytic studies and average salaries and costs of medical care in Sweden.
SETTING: Women attending youth, family planning, and gynecology clinics. PARTICIPANTS: 1000 women and their male sex partners. INTERVENTION: Screening with tissue cell culture, confirmed enzyme immunoassay, and DNA amplification assays based on either polymerase chain reaction or ligase chain reaction was compared with no screening (no treatment and no tracing of sexual contacts). The effect of antibiotic regimens on the outcome of the screening strategies was also evaluated.
RESULTS: When the prevalence of chlamydial infection exceeded 6%, screening of women with DNA amplification assay and treatment of positive patients with a single oral dose of azithromycin given under supervision in the clinic was the most cost-effective intervention strategy. At greater prevalences, screening with enzyme immunoassay also generated savings and improved the cure rates compared with no screening, but such screening was less cost-effective than screening with a DNA amplification assay. Compared with no intervention, tissue cell culture is cost-effective only when the prevalence of infection is greater than 14%. Compared with the azithromycin regimen, the standard 7-day, twice-daily doxycycline regimen resulted in significantly lower cure rates because of patients' poor compliance with this regimen.
CONCLUSION: For asymptomatic female carriers of C. trachomatis, screening with a DNA amplification assay combined with the single-dose azithromycin treatment of positive patients is the most cost-effective strategy when the prevalence is 6%. When the prevalence is lower than 6%, the decision to choose a competing strategy depends on the physician's view of the value of preventing an illness caused by untreated chlamydial infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 7503471     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_1-199601010-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  26 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic inflammatory disease epidemiology: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  I Simms; J M Stephenson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Mailed, home-obtained urine specimens: a reliable screening approach for detecting asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  S A Morré; I G van Valkengoed; A de Jong; A J Boeke; J T van Eijk; C J Meijer; A J van den Brule
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies.

Authors:  E Honey; C Augood; A Templeton; I Russell; J Paavonen; P-A Mårdh; A Stary; B Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 4.  One to one interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections and under the age of 18 conceptions: a systematic review of the economic evaluations.

Authors:  L Barham; D Lewis; N Latimer
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 5.  Is Europe ready for STD screening?

Authors:  P A Mårdh
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-04

Review 6.  Is screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection cost effective?

Authors:  J Paavonen
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-04

7.  Screening pregnant women in the 2015 European guideline on the management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  D Joseph Davey; A Medline; J D Klausner
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.359

8.  Adolescence and other risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women in Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  H Williams; S N Tabrizi; W Lee; G T Kovacs; S Garland
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Evaluation of the Abbott LCx ligase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine and genital swab specimens from a sexually transmitted disease clinic population.

Authors:  K C Carroll; W E Aldeen; M Morrison; R Anderson; D Lee; S Mottice
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Reasons for testing women for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the Calgary region.

Authors:  Deirdre L Church; Ali Zentner; Heather Semeniuk; Elizabeth Henderson; Ron Read
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.