Literature DB >> 7497885

Correlation between Goldmann perimetry and maximal electroretinogram response in retinitis pigmentosa.

A Iannaccone1, E Rispoli, E M Vingolo, P Onori, K Steindl, D Rispoli, M R Pannarale.   

Abstract

To evaluate the relationship between Goldmann perimetry and maximal electroretinographic responses in patients with retinitis pigmentosa, analyses were performed on 220 affected subjects and separately on two subgroups with autosomal dominant (n = 35) and autosomal recessive (n = 29) inheritance. Electroretinograms were recorded averaging 100 iterations elicited with a 20-lux/s, 0.5-Hz white flash ganzfeld stimulation. The peripheral isopters of the visual fields were delimited with I4e, IIIe and V4e targets, measured on conventional perimetry charts with a light pen and expressed in square centimeters. Unlike most previously published reports, this investigation showed a definite correlation (p = 0.0001) between maximal electroretinographic response amplitude and visual field areas. This correlation was more evident for I4e and IIIe isopters (r = 0.89 and 0.87, respectively) than for V4e isopter (r = 0.69). This phenomenon appears to be related to distortion occurring on standard isometric charts and to spatial summation effects in the peripheral field. Such correlations held for both the autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive subgroups. It appears that, if enough accuracy is provided, maximal electroretinographic responses and Goldmann visual fields are both good measures of the remaining functioning retina in nonsyndromic retinitis pigmentosa, irrespective of inheritance models and dystrophic patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7497885     DOI: 10.1007/bf01203333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  14 in total

1.  Detection of the electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  J C ARMINGTON; P GOURAS; D I TEPAS; R GUNKEL
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  The relationship between rod perimetric thresholds and full-field rod ERGs in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  D G Birch; W K Herman; J M deFaller; D T Disbrow; E E Birch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Statistical evaluation of visual functions in dominant and recessive autosomal pigmentary retinopathy.

Authors:  A De Rouck; S de Bie; D Kayembe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-03-31       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Low-noise electroretinogram recording techniques in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  E Rispoli; A Iannaccone; E M Vingolo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Unusual electroretinograms.

Authors:  G Niemeyer
Journal:  Dev Ophthalmol       Date:  1984

6.  Visual field area on the Goldmann hemispheric perimeter surface. Correction of cartographic errors inherent in perimetry.

Authors:  T H Kirkham; E Meyer
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.424

7.  Correlations between electroretinography, morphology and function in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  M Fahle; K P Steuhl; E Aulhorn
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. A method of classification.

Authors:  G A Fishman; K R Alexander; R J Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-03

9.  Rod and cone psychophysics and electroretinography: methods for comparison in retinal degenerations.

Authors:  K Yagasaki; S G Jacobson; P P Apáthy; R W Knighton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  [Variability of visual acuity, dark adaptation and electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa].

Authors:  G Niemeyer; K Gurewitsch
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 0.700

View more
  5 in total

1.  Variability and Errors of Manually Digitized Goldmann Visual Fields.

Authors:  Michael P Barry; Ava K Bittner; Liancheng Yang; Rebecca Marcus; Mian Haris Iftikhar; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Bilateral paraneoplastic optic neuropathy and unilateral retinal compromise in association with prostate cancer: a differential diagnostic challenge in a patient with unexplained visual loss.

Authors:  Giovannella Carboni; Gina Forma; April D Bond; Grazyna Adamus; Alessandro Iannaccone
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The special electrophysiological signs of inherited retinal dystrophies.

Authors:  Elena Prokofyeva; Eric Troeger; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2012-10-31

Review 4.  What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Siân E Handley; Maja Šuštar; Manca Tekavčič Pompe
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Evaluating the Performance of qVFM in Mapping the Visual Field of Simulated Observers With Eye Diseases.

Authors:  Pengjing Xu; Luis Andres Lesmes; Deyue Yu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.