Literature DB >> 7497661

Tibial wedge augmentation for bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty. A followup study.

M W Pagnano1, R T Trousdale, J A Rand.   

Abstract

This report constitutes a followup of a previous study of 28 knees in 25 patients with metal wedge augmentation for tibial bone deficiency. Those patients were reviewed 2.3 years after surgery; 79% had excellent results, and 21% had good results. Twenty-four knees in 21 patients with a metal wedge augmentation for tibial bone deficiency were reviewed 5.6 years clinically and 4.8 years radiographically after surgery. Clinical results were excellent in 67%, good in 29%, and poor in 4%. The only poor result was in 1 knee that required 2 revision procedures: the first for failure of a metal-backed patellar component and the second for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. Radiolucent lines at the cement bone interface beneath the metal wedge were present in 13 knees. Eleven of those radiolucencies were < 1 mm in width, and 2 were 1 to 3 mm in width. None of those lucent lines were progressive. Metal wedge augmentation for tibial bone deficiency is a useful option. No deterioration of the wedge-prosthesis or wedge-cement-bone interface was seen at midterm followup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7497661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Kirschner; J Lützner; S Fickert; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Stemmed implants improve stability in augmented constrained condylar knees.

Authors:  Jeremy J Rawlinson; Robert F Closkey; Nicole Davis; Timothy M Wright; Russell Windsor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Bone loss management in total knee revision surgery.

Authors:  Gabriele Panegrossi; Marco Ceretti; Matteo Papalia; Filippo Casella; Fabio Favetti; Francesco Falez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Preliminary results of managing large medial tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty: autogenous morcellised bone graft.

Authors:  Takehiko Sugita; Toshimi Aizawa; Naohisa Miyatake; Akira Sasaki; Masayuki Kamimura; Atsushi Takahashi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.

Authors:  S A Hanna; W J S Aston; N J de Roeck; A Gough-Palmer; D P Powles
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Double metal tibial blocks augmentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyu Sung Chung; Jin Kyu Lee; Hee Jae Lee; Choong Hyeok Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Biomechanical Analysis of the Use of Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bernardo Innocenti; Edoardo Bori; Silvia Pianigiani
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-19

8.  Posterior glenoid wear in total shoulder arthroplasty: eccentric anterior reaming is superior to posterior augment.

Authors:  Tim Wang; Geoffrey D Abrams; Anthony W Behn; Derek Lindsey; Nicholas Giori; Emilie V Cheung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Management of severe tibial bony defects with double metal blocks in knee arthroplasty-a technical note involving 9 cases.

Authors:  Seung-Wook Baek; Choong H Choi
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Mid-term clinical results of primary total knee arthroplasty using metal block augmentation and stem extension in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Satoshi Hamai; Hisaaki Miyahara; Yukio Esaki; Goh Hirata; Kazumasa Terada; Nobuo Kobara; Kiyoshi Miyazaki; Takahiro Senju; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.