Literature DB >> 7492734

Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds: model validation and Ah receptor characterization.

C L Waller1, J D McKinney.   

Abstract

In the present study we have utilized comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), a three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship paradigm, to explore the physico-chemical requirements for binding to the Ah (dioxin) receptor. Recent developments by Gillner et al. [(1993) Mol. Pharmacol. 44, 336-345] prompted us to review and revise our previous CoMFA/QSAR model [Waller, C. L., and McKinney, J. D. (1992) J. Med. Chem. 36, 3660-3666] to include a structurally-diverse training set of Ah receptor ligands ranging in size from naphthalene to indolo[3,2-b]carbazole nuclei. An exhaustive validation process utilizing external test sets and hierarchical cluster analysis routines was employed during model construction and is discussed herein. The limitations of the approach presented herein are discussed with respect to predictive ability of the CoMFA/QSAR models, which is demonstrated to be dependent on a balance between structural diversity and redundancy in the molecules comprising the training set. The results of our modified CoMFA/QSAR model are consistent with and unify all previously established structure-activity relationships established for less structurally-diverse training sets of Ah receptor ligands. As a result of the more complete nature of the series of molecules under examination in the present study, the CoMFA/QSAR steric and electrostatic field contour plots as well as the essential and excluded volume plots provide for a more detailed characterization of the molecular binding domain of the Ah receptor. The implications of the CoMFA/QSAR model presented herein are explored with respect to quantitative hazard identification of potential toxicants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7492734     DOI: 10.1021/tx00048a005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  17 in total

1.  Mechanism-based common reactivity pattern (COREPA) modelling of aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding affinity.

Authors:  P I Petkov; J C Rowlands; R Budinsky; B Zhao; M S Denison; O Mekenyan
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Determination of in vitro relative potency (REP) values for mono-ortho polychlorinated biphenyls after purification with active charcoal.

Authors:  A K Peters; P E Leonards; B Zhao; A Bergman; M S Denison; M Van den Berg
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 3.  Xenobiotic metabolism, disposition, and regulation by receptors: from biochemical phenomenon to predictors of major toxicities.

Authors:  Curtis J Omiecinski; John P Vanden Heuvel; Gary H Perdew; Jeffrey M Peters
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Mammary carcinogen-protein binding potentials: novel and biologically relevant structure-activity relationship model descriptors.

Authors:  A R Cunningham; S Qamar; C A Carrasquer; P A Holt; J M Maguire; S L Cunningham; J O Trent
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Interaction of diuron and related substituted phenylureas with the Ah receptor pathway.

Authors:  Bin Zhao; David S Baston; Bruce Hammock; Michael S Denison
Journal:  J Biochem Mol Toxicol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.642

6.  Zebrafish cardiotoxicity: the effects of CYP1A inhibition and AHR2 knockdown following exposure to weak aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonists.

Authors:  Daniel R Brown; Bryan W Clark; Lindsey V T Garner; Richard T Di Giulio
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Ligand selectivity and gene regulation by the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Colin A Flaveny; Iain A Murray; Chris R Chiaro; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Molecular determinants of species-specific agonist and antagonist activity of a substituted flavone towards the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  E C Henry; T A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 9.  The search for endogenous activators of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Linh P Nguyen; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Antagonism of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling by 6,2',4'-trimethoxyflavone.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Colin A Flaveny; Brett C DiNatale; Chris R Chairo; Jennifer C Schroeder; Ann Kusnadi; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.030

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.