Literature DB >> 7492421

Development of a questionnaire to measure patients' satisfaction with general practitioners' services.

S Grogan1, M Conner, D Willits, P Norman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is now a requirement that patients' satisfaction with the services obtained from their general practitioner should be surveyed. AIM: The aim of the study was to produce a reliable and valid multidimensional patient satisfaction questionnaire that could be used in general practice.
METHOD: Items were originally derived from patients' responses to open-ended questions. The resulting 148-item Likert-scale questionnaire was completed by 1193 patients. General satisfaction items were removed from the set, and responses to remaining items underwent factor analysis. Subscales were produced from items representing each factor. Reliability and validity of each subscale were examined.
RESULTS: Five subscales with a total of 40 items resulted from the factor analysis: doctors, access, nurses, appointments and facilities. Each subscale was internally reliable (Cronbach's alpha coefficient between 0.73 and 0.95), and initial tests of validity suggested that all subscales were valid.
CONCLUSION: The study has resulted in a 40-item scale that has been found to be reliable and valid after initial tests. Further work to test the reliability and validity of the final version of the patient satisfaction questionnaire is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7492421      PMCID: PMC1239403     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  12 in total

1.  Happy ever after.

Authors:  S Michie; J Kidd
Journal:  Health Serv J       Date:  1994-02-03

2.  Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-13

3.  Patient satisfaction questionnaire.

Authors:  A D Mangelsdorff
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Survey of patients' satisfaction with access to general practitioners.

Authors:  D Allen; R Leavey; B Marks
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-04

5.  Satisfaction with medical care: its measurement and relation to utilization.

Authors:  K J Roghmann; A Hengst; T R Zastowny
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  The need for another look at the patient in general practice satisfaction surveys.

Authors:  J L Hopton; J G Howie; A M Porter
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  The reliability and criterion validity of a measure of patients' satisfaction with their general practice.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 10.  Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis.

Authors:  M Wensing; R Grol; A Smits
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of psychotherapeutic, pharmacological, and combined treatments for chronic depression: a systematic review (METACHRON).

Authors:  Levente Kriston; Alessa von Wolff; Lars Hölzel
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.630

2.  The WOMB (Women's views of birth) antenatal satisfaction questionnaire: development, dimensions, internal reliability, and validity.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Assessing quality in primary care. Can we ask the right questions?

Authors:  A Borgiel; J J O'Neil
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: dimensions, validity, and internal reliability.

Authors:  L F Smith
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03

5.  Patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care.

Authors:  R K McKinley; C Roberts
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03

6.  Validation of a questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with general practitioner services.

Authors:  S Grogan; M Conner; P Norman; D Willits; I Porter
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

7.  Association of Nurses' Self-Reported Empathy and Mu Suppression with Patients' Satisfaction.

Authors:  Nasser Goodarzi; Kamran Azma; Ehsan Tavakolian; Pedram Peyvand
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2015-09-01

8.  Improving the care of children with advanced cancer by using an electronic patient-reported feedback intervention: results from the PediQUEST randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joanne Wolfe; Liliana Orellana; E Francis Cook; Christina Ullrich; Tammy Kang; Jeffrey Russell Geyer; Chris Feudtner; Jane C Weeks; Veronica Dussel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Postnatal care: development of a psychometric multidimensional satisfaction questionnaire (the WOMBPNSQ) to assess women's views.

Authors:  Lindsay F P Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Measuring patients' attitudes to care across the primary/secondary interface: the development of the patient career diary.

Authors:  R Baker; C Preston; F Cheater; H Hearnshaw
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.