Literature DB >> 7492023

Comparison of diagnostic specimens and methods to evaluate infected venous access ports.

E D Whitman1, A M Boatman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implanted venous access port infection can be difficult to diagnose and treat. If device removal is necessary, confirming port infection is problematic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Culture specimens from three sites, catheter tip (Tip), port pocket, and the material within the reservoir (Inside), were sent from ports removed for potential infection. The results of these cultures were compared to preremoval peripheral and central blood cultures.
RESULTS: Forty-five ports were removed for suspected infection. Confirmed port infection was defined as positive culture(s) from one or more experimental specimen(s). In 29 evaluable cases, the Inside specimens were completely predictive. Tip specimens were less accurate, even with a lower diagnostic threshold. In 7 of 19 confirmed infections, only the Inside culture was diagnostic.
CONCLUSION: The most predictive culture specimen in a potentially infected port is the thrombotic material inside the reservoir.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7492023     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80038-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

1.  Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteremia in cancer patients.

Authors:  B Rijnders
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Leonard A Mermel; Michael Allon; Emilio Bouza; Donald E Craven; Patricia Flynn; Naomi P O'Grady; Issam I Raad; Bart J A Rijnders; Robert J Sherertz; David K Warren
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Use of universal 16S rRNA gene PCR as a diagnostic tool for venous access port-related bloodstream infections.

Authors:  M Guembe; M Marín; P Martín-Rabadán; A Echenagusia; F Camúñez; G Rodríguez-Rosales; G Simó; M Echenagusia; E Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Safety of Insertion of Percutaneous Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Keisuke Obuchi; Ken Imaizumi; Hiroyuki Kasajima; Michihiro Kurushima; Minoru Umehara; Yousuke Tsuruga; Daisuke Yamana; Kentaro Sato; Aya Sato; Shinsaku Suzuki; Kazuaki Nakanishi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Implantable venous port-related infections in cancer patients.

Authors:  Wen-Tsung Huang; Tsai-Yun Chen; Wu-Chou Su; Chia-Jui Yen; Chao-Jung Tsao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Removal of totally implanted venous access ports for suspected infection in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Marie Lecronier; Sandrine Valade; Naike Bigé; Nicolas de Prost; Damien Roux; David Lebeaux; Eric Maury; Elie Azoulay; Alexandre Demoule; Martin Dres
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 6.925

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.