Literature DB >> 7492018

Surgical margins after needle-localization breast biopsy.

J A Acosta1, J A Greenlee, K D Gubler, C J Goepfert, J J Ragland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of needle-localization breast biopsy (NLBB) for the early diagnosis of breast cancer is common. The therapeutic adequacy of tumor-free margins following NLBB is unknown. We hypothesized that the presence of residual tumor after reexcision (mastectomy, tylectomy, or quadrantectomy) does not depend on the margin status following NLBB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis was performed on 890 consecutive NLBBs executed between January 1990 and June 1994. Patients with invasive breast neoplasia were divided into two groups based on the tumor margins after NLBB. Group 1 were the women with positive margins, and group 2 had negative margins. Breast specimens after reexcision were reviewed for evidence of residual invasive carcinoma.
RESULTS: Invasive neoplasia was present in 107 patients (12%). Surgical margins and definitive records of care were available for 96 of them (90%). All 45 patients in group 1 and 38 (75%) of 51 patients in group 2 underwent reexcision of the initial biopsy site (P = 0.36). Residual invasive carcinoma was present in 10 patients (22%) in group 1 and 3 (8%) in group 2 (P = 0.13).
CONCLUSION: Invasive breast neoplasia diagnosed by NLBB requires reexcision regardless of tumor margins to achieve complete local surgical eradication of tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7492018     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80033-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

Review 1.  Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic.

Authors:  Maureen P McEvoy; Jeffrey Landercasper; Himani R Naik; Sheldon Feldman
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Linnea Langhans; Maj-Britt Jensen; Maj-Lis M Talman; Ilse Vejborg; Niels Kroman; Tove F Tvedskov
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Comparison of mammographically guided breast biopsy techniques.

Authors:  V Velanovich; F R Lewis; S D Nathanson; V F Strand; G B Talpos; S Bhandarkar; R Elkus; W Szymanski; J J Ferrara
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Breast cancer: Actual methods of treatment and future trends.

Authors:  Paweł Murawa; Dawid Murawa; Beata Adamczyk; Karol Połom
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-01-23

5.  Optimizing surgical margins in breast conservation.

Authors:  Preya Ananthakrishnan; Fatih Levent Balci; Joseph P Crowe
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-09

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery-Results from a postmarketing study.

Authors:  Marc Thill; Iris Szwarcfiter; Katharina Kelling; Viviane van Haasteren; Eyal Kolka; Josefa Noelke; Zachi Peles; Moshe Papa; Sebastian Aulmann; Tanir Allweis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.885

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.