Literature DB >> 30687627

Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic.

Maureen P McEvoy1, Jeffrey Landercasper2, Himani R Naik2, Sheldon Feldman1.   

Abstract

In 2015, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) convened a multidisciplinary consensus conference, the Collaborative Attempt to Lower Lumpectomy Reoperation Rates (CALLER). The CALLER conference endorsed a "toolbox" of multiple processes of care for which there was evidence that they were associated with fewer reoperations. We present an update of the toolbox taking into consideration the latest advances in decreasing re excision rates. In this review, we performed a comprehensive review of the literature from 2015-2018 using search terms for each tool. The original ten tools were updated with the latest evidence from the literature and our strength of recommendation. We added an additional section looking at new tools and techniques that may provide more accurate intraoperative assessment of margins. The updates on the CALLER Toolbox for lumpectomy will help guide surgeons to various resources to aid in the removal of breast cancer, while being aware of cosmesis and decreasing re excision rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast conservation; re-excision rate; re-operation rate; toolbox

Year:  2018        PMID: 30687627      PMCID: PMC6323258          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.11.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  119 in total

1.  Breast specimen orientation.

Authors:  M A Molina; S Snell; D Franceschi; M Jorda; C Gomez; F L Moffat; J Powell; E Avisar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Tanir M Allweis; Zvi Kaufman; Shlomo Lelcuk; Itzhak Pappo; Tami Karni; Shlomo Schneebaum; Rona Spector; Asher Schindel; Dan Hershko; Moshe Zilberman; Joel Sayfan; Yuri Berlin; Amram Hadary; Oded Olsha; Haim Paran; Mordechai Gutman; Moshe Carmon
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Special report: Consensus conference III. Image-detected breast cancer: state-of-the-art diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Melvin J Silverstein; Abram Recht; Michael D Lagios; Ira J Bleiweiss; Peter W Blumencranz; Terri Gizienski; Steven E Harms; Jay Harness; Roger J Jackman; V Suzanne Klimberg; Robert Kuske; Gary M Levine; Michael N Linver; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Hope Rugo; Kathy Schilling; Debu Tripathy; Frank A Vicini; Pat W Whitworth; Shawna C Willey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Cochrane review summary for cancer nursing: drug therapy for the management of cancer-related fatigue.

Authors:  Raymond Chan
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine frozen-section analysis of breast margins compared with reoperation for positive margins.

Authors:  John B Osborn; Gary L Keeney; James W Jakub; Amy C Degnim; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Breast surgery outcomes as quality measures according to the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Dustin L Eck; Stephanie L Koonce; Ross F Goldberg; Sanjay Bagaria; Tammeza Gibson; Steven P Bowers; Sarah A McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Laurence E McCahill; Richard M Single; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Heather S Feigelson; Ted A James; Tom Barney; Jessica M Engel; Adedayo A Onitilo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A significant number of women present with palpable breast cancer even with a normal mammogram within 1 year.

Authors:  Danielle J Haakinson; Chee-Chee H Stucky; Amylou C Dueck; Richard J Gray; Nabil Wasif; Heidi A Apsey; Barbara Pockaj
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karla Esbona; Zhanhai Li; Lee G Wilke
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics.

Authors:  R Jeevan; D A Cromwell; M Trivella; G Lawrence; O Kearins; J Pereira; C Sheppard; C M Caddy; J H P van der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-07-12
View more
  6 in total

1.  The Value of Repeated Breast Surgery as a Quality Indicator in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Francesca Tamburelli; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Revisiting the modern toolkit to optimize breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  David M Lesniak; Krishna B Clough; Brigid K Killelea
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-04

3.  Economic Impact of Reducing Reexcision Rates after Breast-Conserving Surgery in a Large, Integrated Health System.

Authors:  Jeffery M Chakedis; Annie Tang; Alison Savitz; Liisa L Lyon; Patricia E Palacios; Brooke Vuong; Maihgan A Kavanagh; Gillian E Kuehner; Sharon B Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Assessment of photoacoustic tomography contrast for breast tissue imaging using 3D correlative virtual histology.

Authors:  Gurneet S Sangha; Bihe Hu; Guang Li; Sharon E Fox; Andrew B Sholl; J Quincy Brown; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Reoperation rate after breast conserving surgery as quality indicator in breast cancer treatment: A reappraisal.

Authors:  Francesca Tamburelli; Furio Maggiorotto; Caterina Marchiò; Davide Balmativola; Alessandra Magistris; Franziska Kubatzki; Paola Sgandurra; Maria Rosaria Di Virgilio; Daniele Regge; Filippo Montemurro; Marco Gatti; Anna Sapino; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  High-Resolution Full-3D Specimen Imaging for Lumpectomy Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Swati A Kulkarni; Kirti Kulkarni; David Schacht; Sonya Bhole; Ingrid Reiser; Hiroyuki Abe; Jean Bao; Kevin Bethke; Nora Hansen; Nora Jaskowiak; Seema A Khan; Jennifer Tseng; Buxin Chen; Jennifer Pincus; Jeffrey Mueller; Lauren Schulte; Bazil LaBomascus; Zheng Zhang; Dan Xia; Xiaochuan Pan; Christian Wietholt; Dimple Modgil; David Lester; Li Lan; Bidur Bohara; Xiao Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.