Literature DB >> 7490148

A consensus view on the technique of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The Fourth International Consensus Conference on 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

J A Staessen1, R Fagard, L Thijs, A Amery.   

Abstract

This review, based on the Fourth International Consensus Conference on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (Leuven, Belgium, 1994), deals with the technical aspects of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring by noninvasive intermittent techniques is widely used despite artifacts due to cuff size, movement, body position, short-term blood pressure variability, and interference with sleep. The performance of the currently available monitors under truly ambulatory conditions and during exercise remains a matter of debate, as are the procedures required to validate portable monitors under these circumstances. There is general agreement that whenever a monitor is to be used in special populations, such as older subjects or pregnant women, or in special conditions, such as exercise, a specific demonstration of its accuracy in these defined subgroups or conditions is warranted. Whether the auscultatory or oscillometric method is preferred remains controversial because each technique has specific advantages and disadvantages and because both can provide accurate results. Most experts in the field strongly believe that manufacturers should disclose the algorithms of their devices and that they should specify all changes made to the hardware and software of a previously validated monitor. Finally, the development of the volume-clamp method, which makes continuous noninvasive registration of blood pressure at the finger possible in both stationary and ambulatory conditions, opens new perspectives in research, in particular in relation to short-term blood pressure variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7490148     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.6.912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  12 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: from old concepts to novel insights.

Authors:  Mehmet Kanbay; Kultigin Turkmen; Tevfik Ecder; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The effects of urate lowering therapy on inflammation, endothelial function, and blood pressure (SURPHER) study design and rationale.

Authors:  Michael B Saddekni; Kenneth G Saag; Tanja Dudenbostel; Suzanne Oparil; David A Calhoun; Sebastian E Sattui; Daniel I Feig; Paul Muntner; David T Redden; Phillip J Foster; Elizabeth J Rahn; Stephanie R Biggers; Peng Li; Angelo L Gaffo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Hypotension in patients with coronary disease: can profound hypotensive events cause myocardial ischaemic events?

Authors:  P Owens; E O'Brien
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  J A Staessen; E T O'Brien; L Thijs; R H Fagard
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 5.  Clinical positioning of indapamide sustained release 1.5mg in management protocols for hypertension.

Authors:  G Leonetti
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Fatigue and autonomic dysfunction in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Julia L Newton; Jessie Pairman; Katharine Wilton; David E J Jones; Christopher Day
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.435

7.  Reliability of morning, before-dinner, and at-bedtime home blood pressure measurements in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Takeshi Fujiwara; Satoshi Hoshide; Hiroshi Kanegae; Masafumi Nishizawa; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Is ambulatory blood pressure monitoring finally catching on?

Authors:  Debbie L Cohen; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Arm position during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a review of the evidence and clinical guidelines.

Authors:  James B Byrd; Robert D Brook
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Comparing differences and correlation between 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and office blood pressure monitoring in patients with untreated hypertension.

Authors:  Zhenhong Zhang; Shunyin Wang; Junru Yan; Zhiwen Xu; Dongliang Liang; Baohua Liu; Junjie Liang; Mingjie Chen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.