Literature DB >> 34187215

Comparing differences and correlation between 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and office blood pressure monitoring in patients with untreated hypertension.

Zhenhong Zhang1, Shunyin Wang1, Junru Yan1, Zhiwen Xu1, Dongliang Liang1, Baohua Liu1, Junjie Liang1, Mingjie Chen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed differences and correlations between 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and office blood pressure (OBP) monitoring.
METHODS: We conducted an observational study among 85 untreated patients with essential hypertension and measured 24-hour ABP, OBP, target organ damage (TOD) markers, and metabolism indexes. Variance analysis and the Pearson method were used to compare differences and correlation between the two methods. The Spearman or Pearson method was applied to compare the correlation between TOD markers, blood pressure index, and metabolism index. Linear regression analysis was applied to estimate the quantitative relationship between the blood pressure index and TOD markers.
RESULTS: There were significant differences in the mean and variance of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure and a positive correlation between ABP and OBP. Correlations between the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and average ambulatory SBP, daytime ambulatory SBP, nighttime ambulatory SBP, and fasting blood glucose were significant. Correlations between left intima-media thickness (IMT) and average ambulatory SBP, nighttime ambulatory SBP, right IMT, and nighttime ambulatory SBP were significant. In linear regression analysis of the LVMI (y) and ambulatory SBP (x), the equation was expressed as y = 0.637*x.
CONCLUSION: Nighttime ambulatory SBP may be an optimal predictor of TOD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory blood pressure; carotid intima thickness; left ventricular mass index; monitoring; office blood pressure; target organ damage

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34187215      PMCID: PMC8252350          DOI: 10.1177/03000605211016144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


  30 in total

1.  Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension.

Authors:  Denis L Clement; Marc L De Buyzere; Dirk A De Bacquer; Peter W de Leeuw; Daniel A Duprez; Robert H Fagard; Peter J Gheeraert; Luc H Missault; Jacob J Braun; Roland O Six; Patricia Van Der Niepen; Eoin O'Brien
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Aortic Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Target Organ Damage: Are the Data Really Conflicting?

Authors:  Antonios A Argyris; Thomas Weber; Athanase D Protogerou
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 3.  Isolated nocturnal hypertension: a disease masked in the dark.

Authors:  Yan Li; Ji-Guang Wang
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  NICE guideline on hypertension.

Authors:  Helen Jaques
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Prognostic role of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in patients with nondialysis chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Roberto Minutolo; Rajiv Agarwal; Silvio Borrelli; Paolo Chiodini; Vincenzo Bellizzi; Felice Nappi; Bruno Cianciaruso; Pasquale Zamboli; Giuseppe Conte; Francis B Gabbai; Luca De Nicola
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-06-27

Review 6.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertension.

Authors:  Md Shahidul Islam
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Accurate Blood Pressure in the Office.

Authors:  Wanpen Vongpatanasin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Predictive values of automated blood pressure measurement: what can we learn from the Japanese population - the Ohasama study.

Authors:  Y Imai; A Hozawa; T Ohkubo; I Tsuji; J Yamaguchi; M Matsubara; M Michimata; J Hashimoto; T Fujiwara; K Nagai; H Kitaoka; H Satoh; S Hisamichi
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.444

9.  Nighttime blood pressure, systolic blood pressure variability, and left ventricular mass index in children with hypertension.

Authors:  Ajay P Sharma; Javed Mohammed; Benson Thomas; Nathan Lansdell; Kambiz Norozi; Guido Filler
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 10.  Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review.

Authors:  J Hodgkinson; J Mant; U Martin; B Guo; F D R Hobbs; J J Deeks; C Heneghan; N Roberts; R J McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.