Literature DB >> 7488421

Socioeconomic status and breast cancer survival in the southeastern Netherlands, 1980-1989.

C T Schrijvers1, J W Coebergh, L H van der Heijden, J P Mackenbach.   

Abstract

Socioeconomic differences in breast cancer survival in the southeastern Netherlands between 1980 and 1989 were studied (n = 3928), as was the impact of prognostic factors (stage at diagnosis, morphology, and treatment) on such differences. An area-based measure of socioeconomic status (SES) in five groups, based on the postcode of residence at the time of diagnosis, was used. In univariate analyses the relative survival rate was used to correct for causes of death other than breast cancer. The measure of outcome in multivariate analyses was the hazard ratio. The results of both univariate and multivariate analyses suggested a small survival advantage for the higher SES groups. In a model with follow-up period, SES and age, the hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for SES groups from high to low were: 1.00, 1.06 (0.84-1.33), 1.04 (0.86-1.26), 1.15 (0.96-1.38), 1.18 (0.99-1.42). After a correction for stage at diagnosis, differences in survival were reduced substantially. Morphology and treatment were not important explanatory factors of the SES survival association. We conclude that small socioeconomic differences in breast cancer survival exist in The Netherlands and that stage at diagnosis is the most important determinant of such differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7488421     DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00272-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  4 in total

1.  Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study.

Authors:  P W Dickman; A Auvinen; E T Voutilainen; T Hakulinen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Deprivation and emergency admissions for cancers of colorectum, lung, and breast in south east England: ecological study.

Authors:  A M Pollock; N Vickers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

3.  Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival: a population-based study.

Authors:  W J Louwman; L V van de Poll-Franse; J Fracheboud; J A Roukema; J W W Coebergh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Socioeconomic status and its relation with breast cancer recurrence and survival in young women in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marissa C van Maaren; Bernard Rachet; Gabe S Sonke; Audrey Mauguen; Virginie Rondeau; Sabine Siesling; Aurélien Belot
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.890

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.