Literature DB >> 9677214

Deprivation and emergency admissions for cancers of colorectum, lung, and breast in south east England: ecological study.

A M Pollock1, N Vickers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relation between deprivation and acute emergency admissions for cancers of the colon, rectum, lung, and breast in south east England.
DESIGN: Ecological analysis with data from hospital episode statistics and 1991 census.
SETTING: North and South Thames Regional Health Authorities (population about 14 million), divided into 10 aggregations of 31 470 census enumeration districts (median population 462).
SUBJECTS: 146 639 admissions relating to 76 552 patients aged <100 years on admission, resident in the Thames regions, admitted between 1 April 1992 and 31 March 1995.
RESULTS: Residents living in deprived areas were more likely to be admitted as emergencies and has ordinary inpatient admissions and less likely to be admitted as day cases. Adjusted odds of ordinary admissions from the most deprived tenth occurring as emergencies (relative to admissions from the most affluent tenth) were 2.29 (95% confidence interval 2.09 to 2.52) for colorectal cancer, 2.20 (1.99 to 2.43) for lung cancer, and 2.41 (2.17 to 2.67) for female breast cancer; adjusted odds of admissions as day cases were 0.70 (0.64 to 0.76), 0.50 (0.44 to 0.56), and 0.56 (0.50 to 0. 62), respectively. Patients from deprived areas with lung or breast cancers were less likely to be recorded as having surgical interventions. Adjusted odds of patients from the most deprived tenth receiving surgery were 0.88 (0.78 to 1.00), 0.58 (0.48 to 0. 70), and 0.63 (0.56 to 0.71), respectively. Admissions for colorectal cancer from the most deprived areas were less likely to be to hospitals admitting 100 or more new patients a year; the opposite held true for breast cancer admissions. No association was found for lung cancer admissions.
CONCLUSIONS: Earlier diagnostic and referral procedures in primary care in deprived areas are required if there are to be significant reductions in mortality from these cancers. A national information strategy is required to ensure the continued availability of population based data on NHS patients and to mandate standardised datasets from the private sector. Rationalisation of acute services, hospital mergers, and plans for bed closures must take into account the increased healthcare needs and inequities in access to treatment and care of residents in areas with high levels of deprivation. Health authorities and primary care groups should re-examine their purchasing intentions, service reviews, and monitoring arrangements in the light of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9677214      PMCID: PMC28615          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  18 in total

1.  Performance indicators for general practice.

Authors:  F A Majeed; S Voss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-22

2.  Deprivation payments to general practitioners.

Authors:  F A Majeed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-24

3.  Using data from the 1991 census.

Authors:  F A Majeed; D G Cook; J Poloniecki; D Martin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-10

4.  Access to elective surgery at electoral ward level: the impact of the private sector.

Authors:  K H Lamden; A J Sudell
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1995-03

5.  Deprivation, stage at diagnosis and cancer survival.

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; J P Mackenbach; J M Lutz; M J Quinn; M P Coleman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1995-11-03       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates.

Authors:  F A Majeed; D G Cook; H R Anderson; S Hilton; S Bunn; C Stones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-14

7.  Socioeconomic variation in cancer survival in the southeastern Netherlands, 1980-1989.

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; J W Coebergh; L H van der Heijden; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  From the surgery to the surgeon: does deprivation influence consultation and operation rates?

Authors:  N Chaturvedi; Y Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Social deprivation and premature mortality: regional comparison across England.

Authors:  M Eames; Y Ben-Shlomo; M G Marmot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-30

10.  Deprivation and survival from breast cancer.

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; J P Mackenbach; J M Lutz; M J Quinn; M P Coleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  29 in total

1.  Risk of adverse gastrointestinal outcomes in patients taking cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based nested case-control analysis.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carol Coupland; Richard Logan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-03

2.  Influence of material deprivation on prescribing patterns within a deprived population.

Authors:  D Williams; C Teljeur; K Bennett; A Kelly; J Feely
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Prognostic implications of emergency admission and delays in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Maximino Redondo; Isabel Rodrigo; Teresa Pereda; Rafael Funez; Mercedes Acebal; Emilio Perea-Milla; Eugenio Jimenez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Primary and secondary care management of women with early breast cancer from affluent and deprived areas: retrospective review of hospital and general practice records.

Authors:  U Macleod; S Ross; C Twelves; W D George; C Gillis; G C Watt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

5.  Deprivation and emergency admissions for cancers. Other possible explanations for findings need to be explored.

Authors:  J Mindell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-30

6.  Explaining variation in hospital admission rates between general practices: cross sectional study.

Authors:  F D Reid; D G Cook; A Majeed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-10

7.  Lung cancer in Teesside (UK) and Varese (Italy): a comparison of management and survival.

Authors:  A Imperatori; R N Harrison; D N Leitch; F Rovera; G Lepore; G Dionigi; P Sutton; L Dominioni
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Inequalities in survival from colorectal cancer: a comparison of the impact of deprivation, treatment, and host factors on observed and cause specific survival.

Authors:  H Wrigley; P Roderick; S George; J Smith; M Mullee; J Goddard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Predictors of mortality in HIV-associated hospitalizations in Portugal: a hierarchical survival model.

Authors:  Sara S Dias; Valeska Andreozzi; Maria O Martins; Jorge Torgal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Social variations in access to hospital care for patients with colorectal, breast, and lung cancer between 1999 and 2006: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics.

Authors:  Rosalind Raine; Wun Wong; Shaun Scholes; Charlotte Ashton; Austin Obichere; Gareth Ambler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.