Literature DB >> 7487161

The decline of mink in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina: the role of contaminants.

S L Osowski1, L W Brewer, O E Baker, G P Cobb.   

Abstract

Since the 1960s, mink (Mustela vision) populations in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina have declined, especially in the coastal plain. A prior study suggested that the decline may stem from environmental contaminants. Based on water quality data from each state, we identified 17 substances potentially related to the decline: aldrin, dieldrin, endrin, DDD, DDE, DDT, PCBs, chlordane, alpha-BHC, toxaphene, dibenzofuran, copper, chromium, cadmium, lead, arsenic, and mercury. Mink livers were analyzed for PCB and organochlorine pesticides, and kidneys and femurs were analyzed for metals. Reference sample concentrations from piedmont, mountain, and foothill locations were compared to state coastal plain totals and counties. PCBs for Georgia, dieldrin for South Carolina, and endrin and aldrin for North Carolina were significantly higher than the piedmont reference group. Liver PCB concentrations were higher than those known to cause mink reproductive dysfunction. Mercury concentrations were significantly higher in coastal plain mink from all three states and were in the range of those known to cause impacts to reproduction, growth, and behavior to wild mink. It is unknown what concentrations of cyclodienes cause reduced reproduction or other physiological effects in mink, but the levels reported here probably indicate background concentrations that do not contribute to the decline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7487161     DOI: 10.1007/bf00212510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  15 in total

1.  The effects of polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury, singly and in combination, on mink. I: uptake and toxic responses.

Authors:  C D Wren; D B Hunter; J F Leatherland; P M Stokes
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticide residues in adipose, liver, and brain samples from Iowa mink.

Authors:  J C Franson; P A Dahm; L D Wing
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 2.151

3.  Effects of dietary mercury on mink.

Authors:  R J Aulerich; R K Ringer; S Iwamoto
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  The effects of polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury, singly and in combination on mink. II: Reproduction and kit development.

Authors:  C D Wren; D B Hunter; J F Leatherland; P M Stokes
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Current status of PCB toxicity to mink, and effect on their reproduction.

Authors:  R J Aulerich; R K Ringer
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Levels of cadmium, mercury and lead in otter and mink faeces from the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C F Mason; S M MacDonald
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  Cause-effect linkages between chemicals and populations of mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis) in the Great Lakes basin.

Authors:  C D Wren
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1991-08

8.  Feeding Great Lakes fish to mink: effects on mink and accumulation and elimination of PCBS by mink.

Authors:  T C Hornshaw; R J Aulerich; H E Johnson
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1983 Apr-Jun

9.  Mercury poisoning in a wild mink.

Authors:  G Wobeser; M Swift
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.535

10.  Dietary effects of polychlorinated biphenyls on mink.

Authors:  N S Platonow; L H Karstad
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1973-10
View more
  10 in total

1.  Mercury and other heavy metals in free-ranging mink of the lower Great Lakes basin, Canada, 1998-2006.

Authors:  Pamela A Martin; Tana V McDaniel; Kimberley D Hughes; Bruce Hunter
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Mercury in gray wolves (Canis lupus) in Alaska: increased exposure through consumption of marine prey.

Authors:  Ashley K McGrew; Lora R Ballweber; Sara K Moses; Craig A Stricker; Kimberlee B Beckmen; Mo D Salman; Todd M O'Hara
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Organochlorine contaminants in wild mink from the lower Great Lakes basin, Canada, 1998-2006.

Authors:  Pamela A Martin; Tana V McDaniel; Kimberley D Hughes; Bruce Hunter
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Metal contamination of river otters in North Carolina.

Authors:  Charles W Sanders; Krishna Pacifici; George R Hess; Colleen Olfenbuttel; Christopher S DePerno
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Concentrations and profiles of polychlorinated biphenyls, -dibenzo-p-dioxins and -dibenzofurans in livers of mink from South Carolina and Louisiana, U.S.A.

Authors:  Carrie L Tansy; Kurunthachalam Senthilkumar; Stephanie D Pastva; Kurunthachalam Kannan; William W Bowerman; Shigeki Masunaga; John P Giesy
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Comparison of hepatic and nephric total mercury concentrations between feral and ranch American mink (Neovison vison) from northwestern Poland.

Authors:  Elzbieta Kalisinska; Halina Budis; Natalia Lanocha; Joanna Podlasinska; Ewa Jedrzejewska; Danuta I Kosik-Bogacka
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 7.  Aldrin and dieldrin: a review of research on their production, environmental deposition and fate, bioaccumulation, toxicology, and epidemiology in the United States.

Authors:  J L Jorgenson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Healthy environments for healthy people: bioremediation today and tomorrow.

Authors:  C Bonaventura; F M Johnson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Environmental contaminants in freshwater fish and their risk to piscivorous wildlife based on a national monitoring program.

Authors:  Jo Ellen Hinck; Christopher J Schmitt; Kimberly A Chojnacki; Donald E Tillitt
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  The use of chemical markers for the identification of farm escapees in feral mink populations.

Authors:  Marcin Brzeziński; Andrzej Zalewski; Agnieszka Niemczynowicz; Ingeborga Jarzyna; Małgorzata Suska-Malawska
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.823

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.