Literature DB >> 1908526

Cause-effect linkages between chemicals and populations of mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis) in the Great Lakes basin.

C D Wren1.   

Abstract

Following outbreaks of reproductive failure in commercial ranching operations, laboratory experiments showed that mink are extremely sensitive to organochlorine chemicals, particularly PCBs and dioxins. The purpose of this paper is to test the hypothesis that, since wild mink are exposed to these compounds through consumption of Great Lakes fish, they might exhibit reproductive dysfunction and population declines. The otter, another piscivorous animal, should show the same effects. The available information is reviewed according to five epidemiological criteria. Harvest data are presented as a surrogate for the population status of mink and otters in certain locations around the Great Lakes. Data from Ohio show that the mink harvest between 1982 and 1987 from contaminated counties bordering Lake Erie was consistently lower (380 animals per year) than those from counties removed from Lake Erie (850 animals per year), suggesting an effect of chemicals on the status of mink populations. Preliminary studies from Ontario also suggest that mink harvest is lower in potentially "high PCB exposure areas" compared with lower exposure areas. Evidence is also presented on the harvest data for otters taken from four New York State counties adjacent to Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River. The harvest data from these four counties show that between 1960 and early 1970 otter harvest remained stable but has since increased. Increased harvest is consistent with improved water quality in Lake Ontario during the past 15 yr. Data relating to strength of association between chemicals and populations of mink and otter are weak and need to be further analyzed. The specificity of the effects of the chemicals on mink reproduction and mortality is well established from toxicological experiments, but there is poor resolution of the information on effects using field data. The strongest case for a causal relationship comes from consideration of the coherence criterion. In conclusion, before a causal link can be drawn between the status of mink and otter populations and exposure to organochlorine chemicals from the Great Lakes, a large amount of research and data analysis needs to be undertaken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1908526     DOI: 10.1080/15287399109531540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health        ISSN: 0098-4108


  13 in total

1.  Eco-toxicology: traditional and post-normal interpretations of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.

Authors:  M Gilbertson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Use of retrospective data to assess ecotoxicological monitoring needs for terrestrial vertebrates residing in Atlantic coast estuaries.

Authors:  Jonathan B Cohen; Barnett A Rattner; Nancy H Golden
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2003 Feb-Aug       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Dioxin pollution disrupts reproduction in male Japanese field mice.

Authors:  Hiroko Ishiniwa; Mizuki Sakai; Shimon Tohma; Hidenori Matsuki; Yukio Takahashi; Hideo Kajiwara; Tsuneo Sekijima
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Effects of halogenated contaminants on reproductive development in wild mink (Neovison vison) from locations in Canada.

Authors:  John E Elliott; David Anthony Kirk; Pamela A Martin; Laurie K Wilson; Gabriela Kardosi; Sandi Lee; Tana McDaniel; Kimberley D Hughes; Barry D Smith; Abde Miftah Idrissi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Contaminants in fishes from Great Lakes-influenced sections and above dams of three Michigan rivers. II: Implications for health of mink.

Authors:  J P Giesy; D A Verbrugge; R A Othout; W W Bowerman; M A Mora; P D Jones; J L Newsted; C Vandervoort; S N Heaton; R J Aulerich
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  The decline of mink in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina: the role of contaminants.

Authors:  S L Osowski; L W Brewer; O E Baker; G P Cobb
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Wildlife as sentinels of human health effects in the Great Lakes--St. Lawrence basin.

Authors:  G A Fox
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop.

Authors:  R J Kavlock; G P Daston; C DeRosa; P Fenner-Crisp; L E Gray; S Kaattari; G Lucier; M Luster; M J Mac; C Maczka; R Miller; J Moore; R Rolland; G Scott; D M Sheehan; T Sinks; H A Tilson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Defining the role of pollutants in the disruption of reproduction in wildlife.

Authors:  J E Hose; L J Guillette
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Obesity and metabolic comorbidities: environmental diseases?

Authors:  Carla Lubrano; Giuseppe Genovesi; Palma Specchia; Daniela Costantini; Stefania Mariani; Elisa Petrangeli; Andrea Lenzi; Lucio Gnessi
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.