Literature DB >> 7486889

Stories and numbers: coexistence without compromise.

M Ford-Gilboe1, J Campbell, H Berman.   

Abstract

Research methods are not paradigm specific but should be selected on the basis of whether they fit with the purposes of an investigation. In the postpositivist, interpretive, and critical paradigms, both qualitative and quantitative data or a combination of these may be used without violating paradigm assumptions. Attention to the four basic issues of quality of the data, investigator bias, quality of the research process, and usefulness of the finding is necessary to produce valid research. Although researchers in each paradigm deal with these differently, combining strategies across paradigms may enhance the scientific value of a study and result in new methodologies to address the health needs of all people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7486889     DOI: 10.1097/00012272-199509000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci        ISSN: 0161-9268            Impact factor:   1.824


  3 in total

1.  A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Kevin Brazil
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2004-08

2.  Model Integration: Can Understanding Biopsychosocial Gut-Brain Axis Mechanistic Pathways Improve our Clinical Reasoning in Primary Care?

Authors:  Shannon H Ford; Eric A Hodges; Suzanne Thoyre; Maureen Baker; T Robin Bartlett
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 0.767

3.  Did we do everything we could have? Nurses' contributions to medicines optimization: A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Vera Logan; Sarah Keeley; Kevin Akerman; Elyne De Baetselier; Tinne Dilles; Nia Griffin; Lisa Matthews; Bart Van Rompaey; Sue Jordan
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-10-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.