Literature DB >> 33570308

Did we do everything we could have? Nurses' contributions to medicines optimization: A mixed-methods study.

Vera Logan1, Sarah Keeley2, Kevin Akerman1, Elyne De Baetselier3, Tinne Dilles3, Nia Griffin1, Lisa Matthews1, Bart Van Rompaey3, Sue Jordan1.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore UK professionals' interpretations of medicines optimization and expansion of nurses' roles.
DESIGN: This mixed-methods study sought professionals' views on nurses' involvement, competency and engagement in monitoring patients for adverse effects of medicines, monitoring adherence, prescribing and patient education.
METHOD: An online survey and interviews were undertaken with nurses, doctors and pharmacists in Wales and England, May 2018 to July 2019.
RESULTS: In all, 220 nurses, 17 doctors and 62 pharmacists responded to the online survey, and 24 professionals were interviewed. Nurses were divided over extending their roles, with 123/220 (55.9%) wishing to extend roles in monitoring patients for possible adverse drug reactions (ADRs), 111/220 (50.5%) in adherence monitoring, 121/220 (55.0%) in prescribing and 122/220 (55.4%) in patient education. The best-qualified nurses were the most willing to increase involvement in monitoring patients for ADRs (aOR 13.00, 1.56-108.01). Interviews revealed that both nurses and doctors assumed the other profession was undertaking this monitoring. Respondents agreed that increasing nurses' involvement in medicines optimization would improve patient care, but expressed reservations about nurses' competencies. Collaboration between nurses and doctors was suboptimal (rated 7/10 at best) and between nurses and pharmacists even more so (6/10 at best).
CONCLUSION: Juxtaposition of datasets identified problems with medicines optimization: although most respondents agreed that increasing nurses' involvement would positively impact practice, their educational preparation was a barrier. Only ~50% of nurses were willing to expand their roles to fill the hiatus in care identified and ensure that at least one profession was taking responsibility for ADR monitoring. IMPACT: To improve multiprofessional team working and promote patient safety, nurse leaders should ensure patients are monitored for possible ADRs by at least one profession. Initiatives expanding nurses' roles in medicines optimization and prescribing might be best targeted towards the more educated nurses, who have multidisciplinary support.
© 2020 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug-related side effects and adverse reactions; interdisciplinary communication; knowledge; nurses; patient safety; pharmaceutical care; “care gaps”

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33570308      PMCID: PMC7877145          DOI: 10.1002/nop2.664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Open        ISSN: 2054-1058


  36 in total

1.  The biosciences in the pre-registration nursing curriculum: staff and students' perceptions of difficulties and relevance.

Authors:  S Jordan; S Davies; B Green
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 2.  Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.

Authors:  E McColl; A Jacoby; L Thomas; J Soutter; C Bamford; N Steen; R Thomas; E Harvey; A Garratt; J Bond
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  The value of combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation.

Authors:  Christina Foss; Bodil Ellefsen
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Using bioscience knowledge in nursing: actions, interactions and reactions.

Authors:  S Jordan; D Hughes
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 5.  Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  T J Oscanoa; F Lizaraso; Alfonso Carvajal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Risk factors for hospital admissions associated with adverse drug events.

Authors:  Chuenjid Kongkaew; Mark Hann; Jaydeep Mandal; Steven D Williams; David Metcalfe; Peter R Noyce; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.705

7.  What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature.

Authors:  Ghadah Asaad Assiri; Nada Atef Shebl; Mansour Adam Mahmoud; Nouf Aloudah; Elizabeth Grant; Hisham Aljadhey; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  EUPRON: nurses' practice in interprofessional pharmaceutical care in Europe. A cross-sectional survey in 17 countries.

Authors:  Elyne De Baetselier; Bart Van Rompaey; Luis M Batalha; Monica Bergqvist; Bozena Czarkowska-Paczek; Alberto De Santis; Nienke E Dijkstra; Maria I Fernandes; Izabela Filov; Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl; Jana Heczkova; Ann Karin Helgesen; Michael Isfort; Susan Jordan; Igor Karnjus; Sarah Keeley; Petros Kolovos; Gero Langer; Manuel Lillo-Crespo; Vera Logan; Alba Malara; Gabriele Meyer; Andras Olah; Hana Padysakova; Mirko Prosen; Dorina Pusztai; Carolien G Sino; Styliani Tziaferi; Elena Ziakova; Tinne Dilles
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Completion of therapeutic and safety monitoring tests in Lebanese outpatients on chronic medications: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elsy Ramia; Rony Zeenny
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  A systematic review of the prevalence and risk factors for adverse drug reactions in the elderly in the acute care setting.

Authors:  Tariq M Alhawassi; Ines Krass; Beata V Bajorek; Lisa G Pont
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.458

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Nurses and Pharmaceutical Care: Interprofessional, Evidence-Based Working to Improve Patient Care and Outcomes.

Authors:  Tinne Dilles; Jana Heczkova; Styliani Tziaferi; Ann Karin Helgesen; Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl; Bart Van Rompaey; Carolien G Sino; Sue Jordan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.