Literature DB >> 7486116

Performance of computer-controlled infusion of propofol: an evaluation of five pharmacokinetic parameter sets.

J Vuyk1, F H Engbers, A G Burm, A A Vletter, J G Bovill.   

Abstract

Computer-controlled infusion of propofol is used with increasing frequency for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The performance of computer-controlled infusion devices is highly dependent on how well the implemented pharmacokinetic parameter set matches the pharmacokinetics of the patient. This study examined the performance of a computer-controlled infusion device when provided with five different pharmacokinetic parameter sets of propofol in female patients. The infusion rate-time data that had been stored on a disk from 19 female patients who had been given propofol by computer-controlled infusion, using the pharmacokinetic parameter set from Gepts et al. (Anesth Analg 1987;66:1256-63), were entered into a computer simulation program to recalculate predicted propofol concentrations that would have been obtained with four other pharmacokinetic parameter (Shafer et al., Anesthesiology 1988;69:348-56; Kirkpatrick et al., Br J Anesth 1988;60:146-50; Cockshott et al., Br J Anesth 1987;59:941P; Tackley et al., Br J Anesth, 1989;62:46-53) sets of propofol, had these been implemented. The performance error (PE) was determined for each measured blood propofol concentration, on the basis of each of the five pharmacokinetic parameter sets. Then, for each of the five pharmacokinetic parameter sets, the performance in the population was determined by the median absolute performance error (MDAPE), the median performance error (MDPE), the wobble (the median absolute deviation of each PE from the MDPE), and the divergence (the percentage change of the absolute PE with time). The MDPE and MDAPE were compared between the parameter sets by the multisample median test. The initially used pharmacokinetic parameter set from Gepts et al. resulted in a MDPE of 24% and MDAPE of 26%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7486116     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199512000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  19 in total

1.  A compartmental analysis of the pharmacokinetics of propofol in sheep.

Authors:  G L Ludbrook; R N Upton; C Grant; A Martinez
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  [Modern concepts in pharmacokinetics of intravenous anesthetics].

Authors:  T Heidegger; C F Minto; T W Schnider
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Target-controlled infusion systems: role in anaesthesia and analgesia.

Authors:  M C van den Nieuwenhuyzen; F H Engbers; J Vuyk; A G Burm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Induction speed is not a determinant of propofol pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Anthony G Doufas; Maryam Bakhshandeh; Andrew R Bjorksten; Steven L Shafer; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  [Effect compartment equilibration and time-to-peak effect. Importance of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principle for the daily clinical practice].

Authors:  J Bruhn; P M Schumacher; T W Bouillon
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Predictive performance of the 'Minto' remifentanil pharmacokinetic parameter set in morbidly obese patients ensuing from a new method for calculating lean body mass.

Authors:  Luca La Colla; Andrea Albertin; Giorgio La Colla; Andrea Porta; Giorgio Aldegheri; Domenico Di Candia; Fausto Gigli
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol externally validated in children.

Authors:  Byung-Moon Choi; Hyun-Gu Lee; Hyo-Jin Byon; Soo-Han Lee; Eun-Kyung Lee; Hee-Soo Kim; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Titration of the plasma effect site equilibrium rate constant of propofol; a link method of 'Concentration-Probability-Time'.

Authors:  Jong-Yeop Kim; Sung-Yong Park; Sun-Kyung Park; Jin-Soo Kim; Sang-Kee Min
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-03-29

9.  [Accuracy of target-controlled infusion (TCI) with 2 different propofol formulations].

Authors:  H Ihmsen; C Jeleazcov; J Schüttler; H Schwilden; F Bremer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Validation of a computational platform for the analysis of the physiologic mechanisms of a human experimental model of hemorrhage.

Authors:  Richard L Summers; Kevin R Ward; Tarynn Witten; Victor A Convertino; Kathy L Ryan; Thomas G Coleman; Robert L Hester
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 5.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.