Literature DB >> 25724290

Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol externally validated in children.

Byung-Moon Choi1, Hyun-Gu Lee, Hyo-Jin Byon, Soo-Han Lee, Eun-Kyung Lee, Hee-Soo Kim, Gyu-Jeong Noh.   

Abstract

There have been no pharmacokinetic parameters and blood-brain equilibration rate constant (k e0) of propofol obtained in a single population of children, by which propofol can be administered using a target effect-site concentration controlled infusion. Thirty-nine, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1-2 children aged 2-12 years were given an intravenous bolus of propofol (3 mg kg(-1)), followed by infusion (200 µg kg(-1) min(-1)). Arterial drug concentrations and bispectral index (BIS) values were measured. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. External model validation was performed in a separate population of children. A two-compartment model and a sigmoid E max model directly linked by an effect compartment well described the time courses of propofol concentration and BIS. The estimates of parameters were: V 1 (L) = 1.69, V 2 (L) = 27.2 + 0.929 × (weight - 25), Cl (L min(-1)) = 0.893 × (weight/23.6)(0.966), Q (L min(-1)) = 1.3; E 0 = 76.9; E max = 35.4, Ce 50 (μg mL(-1)) = 3.47 - (0.095 × age) - (1.63 × mean infusion rate of remifentanil in µg kg(-1) min(-1)); γ = 2.1; and k e0 (min(-1)) = 0.371. Pooled biases (95 % CI) of the target effect-site concentration controlled infusion system of propofol was -20.2 % (-23.3 to -18.1 %) and pooled inaccuracy was 30.4 % (28.6-32.7 %). Pooled biases of BIS prediction was -6.8 % (-9.1 to -4.1 %) and pooled inaccuracies was 19.1 % (17.5-20.9 %).The altered weight-based dose requirements of propofol are well described pharmacokinetically, and pharmacodynamically. Predictive performances of the TCI system in this study were clinically acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25724290     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-015-9408-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  48 in total

1.  Response surface model for anesthetic drug interactions.

Authors:  C F Minto; T W Schnider; T G Short; K M Gregg; A Gentilini; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  A response surface analysis of propofol-remifentanil pharmacodynamic interaction in volunteers.

Authors:  Steven E Kern; Guoming Xie; Julia L White; Talmage D Egan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Which model for propofol TCI in children.

Authors:  Isabelle Constant; Agnes Rigouzzo
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.556

4.  Simplified calculation of body-surface area.

Authors:  R D Mosteller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Should clearance be normalised to body surface or to lean body mass?

Authors:  T H Hallynck; H H Soep; J A Thomis; J Boelaert; R Daneels; L Dettli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Propofol and remifentanil pharmacodynamic interaction during orthopedic surgical procedures as measured by effects on bispectral index.

Authors:  H Röpcke; M Könen-Bergmann; M Cuhls; T Bouillon; A Hoeft
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of propofol: a multicenter study.

Authors:  J Schüttler; H Ihmsen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  The pharmacokinetics of propofol in children using three different data analysis approaches.

Authors:  B K Kataria; S A Ved; H F Nicodemus; G R Hoy; D Lea; M Y Dubois; J W Mandema; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Comparison of bispectral index and composite auditory evoked potential index for monitoring depth of hypnosis in children.

Authors:  Heleen J Blussé van Oud-Alblas; Jeroen W B Peters; Tom G de Leeuw; Dick Tibboel; Jan Klein; Frank Weber
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Performance of computer-controlled infusion of propofol: an evaluation of five pharmacokinetic parameter sets.

Authors:  J Vuyk; F H Engbers; A G Burm; A A Vletter; J G Bovill
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  9 in total

1.  Population-based volume kinetics of Ringer's lactate solution in patients undergoing open gastrectomy.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Lee; Yeong-Jin Choo; Yong-Hun Lee; Jin-Ho Rhim; Soo-Han Lee; Byung-Moon Choi; Sung-Tae Oh; Kyu-Taek Choi; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Spectral Gini Index for Quantifying the Depth of Consciousness.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin You; Gyu-Jeong Noh; Hyun-Chool Shin
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-20

3.  HCN channels contribute to the sensitivity of intravenous anesthetics in developmental mice.

Authors:  Jie Gao; Zhiqiang Hu; Liwei Shi; Na Li; Yeling Ouyang; Shaofang Shu; Shanglong Yao; Xiangdong Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-02-05

4.  A Simulation Study of Propofol Effect-Site Concentration for Appropriate Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Brain MRI: Pharmacodynamic Analysis.

Authors:  Se Hee Na; Young Song; So Yeon Kim; Hyo Jin Byon; Hwan Ho Jung; Dong Woo Han
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Accuracy assessment of a PION TCI pump based on international standards.

Authors:  Il Doh; Seok Hwan Lee; Yong-Hun Lee; Bokyoung Jeon; Byung-Moon Choi; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2019-10-31

6.  Interpretation of volume kinetics in terms of pharmacokinetic principles.

Authors:  Byung-Moon Choi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-05

7.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of propofol in adolescents undergoing scoliosis surgery with intraoperative wake-up test: a study using Bispectral index and composite auditory evoked potentials as pharmacodynamic endpoints.

Authors:  Heleen J Blussé van Oud-Alblas; Margreke J E Brill; Mariska Y M Peeters; Dick Tibboel; Meindert Danhof; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  A Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Mechanically Ventilated Children after Neurosurgery.

Authors:  In-Kyung Song; SoJeong Yi; Hyeong-Seok Lim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Eun-Hee Kim; Joo-Youn Cho; Min-Chang Kim; Jin-Tae Kim; Hee-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  The relationship between the effect-site concentration of propofol and sedation scale in children: a pharmacodynamic modeling study.

Authors:  Young-Eun Jang; Sang-Hwan Ji; Ji-Hyun Lee; Eun-Hee Kim; Jin-Tae Kim; Hee-Soo Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.217

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.