Literature DB >> 7485348

The impact of initiating a human immunodeficiency virus screening program in an urban obstetric population.

R Lewis1, J M O'Brien, D T Ray, B M Sibai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to describe the incidence of human immunodeficiency virus infection and to assess the cost/benefit ratio of universal antenatal human immunodeficiency virus screening. STUDY
DESIGN: Medical records of women in this urban obstetrics population, from the years 1988 to 1993, were examined. The incidence of known human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity at delivery was determined. The costs of performing human immunodeficiency virus screening, evaluating the disease status, and administering therapy were calculated. These costs were compared with an averaged cost for care and follow-up of infants infected through vertical transmission.
RESULTS: The incidence of known human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity at delivery approximately doubled since the initiation of a human immunodeficiency virus screening program (0.26% to 0.48%). Obstetric screening added an approximate $100,000 to medical costs. The calculated cost of pediatric follow-up of human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive infants for the first 18 months was estimated at $344,355. In our population, with universal screening and zidovudine therapy, the medical costs could be reduced by $175,500 per year.
CONCLUSION: A program of voluntary human immunodeficiency virus screening increases the incidence of known human immunodeficiency virus infection. Offering screening and follow-up to all pregnant patients in an urban setting is both cost-effective and medically beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7485348     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91381-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  The influence of prevalence and policy on the likelihood that a physician will offer HIV screening in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kathleen Steel O'Connor; Susan E MacDonald; Lisa Hartling; Rachelle M Seguin; Hussein Hollands; David L Mowat; John R Hoey; Richard Massé; Michael L Rekart
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

2.  Screening for HIV during pregnancy. Survey of physicians' practices.

Authors:  S E MacDonald; L A Hartling; R M Seguin; K S O'Connor; M L Rekart; D L Mowat; J R Hoey
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Cost effectiveness analysis of antenatal HIV screening in United Kingdom.

Authors:  A E Ades; M J Sculpher; D M Gibb; R Gupta; J Ratcliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-06

4.  Preventing perinatal transmission of HIV--costs and effectiveness of a recommended intervention.

Authors:  R D Gorsky; P G Farnham; W L Straus; B Caldwell; D R Holtgrave; R J Simonds; M F Rogers; M E Guinan
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 5.  Economic issues in the prevention of vertical transmission of HIV.

Authors:  A E Ades; J Ratcliffe; D M Gibb; M J Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Evidence-based guidelines for universal counselling and offering of HIV testing in pregnancy in Canada.

Authors:  L Samson; S King
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-02       Impact factor: 8.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.